Folding a Full House?

I have moved your hand to our hand discussion board. There fits it better.

This is basicly a cooler. Especially on NL2. A normal UTG range I can only think about 1 hand you lose against and that's QQ.

Cheers,
SDK1987

I am never folding here. Especially at NL2. He might be doing this with Qx or a str8. Well played.

Originally posted by msnek
I am never folding here. Especially at NL2. He might be doing this with Qx or a str8. Well played.

I wouldn't fold either.
It is a great example of "https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=7017 0" rel="nofollow ugc" target="_blank">Zeebo's Theorem"

from: https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=70170https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=70170
Zeebo's theorem

Zeebo's theorem is quite a simple one, and is likely to be the most profitable of all the popular poker theorems. Zeebo's theorem states that:

“No player is capable of folding a full house on any betting round, regardless of the size of the bet.”

I would only ever fold a boat if it was on the stone-cold bubble against a player that covered me, and only then in if had the underfull — fives full of queens for example, when queens full of fives is well within opponents range

Edit: You should read the entire linked article. There's a lot of good stuff in it.