When you are looking for good shorthanded tables, are you still looking for tables with high play/flop%? or is it better with a tighter table where you can steal more?
Notifications
Clear all
No Limit
6
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
512
Views
5 replies
Maybe I was not clear enought.
The question is, if it´s better to look for loose or tight table when playing shorthanded?
Anyone have any idea`?
we all know its more profitable playing full ring tables against big stacks yada yada yada,but i personally would want a rather loose table if i chose to play short handed game.in a tight game players only usually play premium hands and fold if miss flops but you can catch lag players bluffing and profit more in my opinion.Ultimatly it depends on your playing style and who you feel you play better against tight or loose players.Hope this helps.
OKey, that what I thought to. So with a tight playing style I should look for loose tables and the other way around if I play loose I supose..
Originally posted by Janusrichmond
So with a tight playing style I should look for loose tables and the other way around if I play loose I supose..
Yes, but good loose/aggressive players also know how to play tight, and would never pass up the opportunity to join a juicy loose table... because that's where the easiest money in poker is. So IMO your priority should always be to find the loosest tables around regardless of your style.