Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] $2 9 max turb 6 handed AQ preflop

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
274 Views
conall88
Joined: 02.01.2009

Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t160 (6 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

MP (t1325)
Hero (t1545)
Button (t1410)
SB (t1240)
BB (t5490)
UTG (t2490)

Preflop: Hero is CO with A♣, Q♣.
1 fold, MP raises to t1325 (All-In), Hero raises to t1545 (All-In), 3 folds.

Flop: (t3110) 8♣, K♠, T♣ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Turn: (t3110) 6♣ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: (t3110) 7♥ (2 players, 2 all-in)
.

Final Pot: t3110

Results in white below:
MP doesn't show. (AJ)
Hero has Ac Qc (flush, ace high).
Outcome: Hero wins t3110.

MP has been playing like a rock for most of early game. VPIP:14 PFR:12 calls 3bet: 13.6%

my stats for the sng VPIP: 18 PFR: 14 call 3bet: 8.1%

MP is a regular multitabler at this limit (9 max 2.25 BI's)

am I right in thinking this call is too wide, or do the blinds and eff stacks justify it?

according to HEM the $ev diff is -$0.98 which is pretty significant.

I expect he can have: AK,AQ,AJ,AT,A9s/o,A8s
KQ,KJ,MAYBE KTs
66+ or 77+

I call with: 88+,AK,AQ,AJs

is HEM speaking truth or is this actually a positive expected scenario. if so, how can I determine when HEM is incorrect?


2 replies

he has to be pushing at least A8o+,44+,KJs+ for you to call with AQs

and imo, this is going to be a very marginal call

this is a spot where you have to be tight against a rock who shoves 8-10BB from early position.

if you have some kind of read that he shoves A8o or 44 here then you can definitely make a good call here with AQs. but without a specific read and just stats i would fold because its way too marginal and you can find a better edge in later hands.


chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Herein lies the problem with stats. If he's a multitabler of course he's going to look like a "rock" in the early stages. However he probably isn't too tight later in the game (or else he'd be a losing player and thus probably not playing multiple tables). So I call AQs here. But that said I don't call much worse (maybe AQo as well).