Session 1
419 hands
+$3.50
Hand 1
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]UTG1$9.05:///////;UTG2$8.70:///////;MP1$10.45:///////;MP2$19.55:///////;MP3 (Hero)$12.60:///////;CO$5.65:///////;BU$10.90:///////;SB$5.70:///////;BB$12.90:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with Q:d, A:d.
2 folds, MP1 raises to $0.40, MP2 folds, Hero calls $0.40, CO calls $0.40, BU calls $0.40, 2 folds.
Flop: ($1.75) 4:d, 2:s, 3:d (4 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $1.20, CO folds, BU raises to $3.00, MP1 folds, Hero raises to $12.20, BU calls $7.50(All-In).
Turn: ($24.45) 7:d (2 players)
River: ($24.45) A:h (2 players)
Final Pot: $24.45.
Results follow:
Hero shows a flush, ace high(Qd Ad).
BU shows a pair of tens(Td Th).
Hero wins with a flush, ace high(Qd Ad).
In general, I started cold-calling more often pre-flop in position against typical TAG regulars on NL10 with hands like these which should be somewhere around the middle of his open-raising range, especially if they are suited. There are two reason for this: I don't like 3-betting it because most regulars will either 4-bet or fold; I thus don't need a value hand for a 3-bet. Second, I get into lots of good spots to float or bluff-raise the turn because they fold way too much. I generally give myself a post-flop edge on this limit, so my position should make this more +EV than 3-betting.
After his check, I don't want to give out any free cards with all the equity I have, so I bet out. Here is a good example where my aggressive image came into play to my advantage. I had a lot of hands with that opponent and he knew I was very aggressive. He would definitely have 3-bet any pair of QQ+, so I can limit his range to JJ- overpairs, two-pairs and sets. Due to his small raise and the way he played so far, I pretty much considered two-pairs and sets very unlikely and I didn't expect to be able to extract much value oop if I just call and hit my flush, so I decided to get it in with fold equity.
In hindsight, I think this was the right decision in that spot, because he really thought for a long time before calling. I think he would have easily folded against a nitty reg TAG here, but he probably thought I might be able to do that with 99- or just gutshot + 2 overcards. I got it in as favourite, so all is good ;).
Hand 2
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]CO$10.30:///////;BU (Hero)$10.00:///////;SB$13.25:///////;BB$10.00:///////;UTG1$11.75:///////;UTG2$14.40:///////;MP1$10.00:///////;MP2$15.00:///////;MP3$10.00:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is BU with K:h, Q:c.
UTG1 folds, UTG2 calls $0.10, MP1 folds, MP2 raises to $0.30, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.30, 2 folds, UTG2 calls $0.20.
Flop: ($1.05) 2:d, 8:c, 6:h (3 players)
UTG2 checks, MP2 bets $0.50, Hero calls $0.50, UTG2 folds.
Turn: ($2.05) K:s (2 players)
MP2 bets $1.00, Hero calls $1.00.
River: ($4.05) 4:c (2 players)
MP2 bets $3.00, Hero calls $3.00.
Final Pot: $10.05.
Results follow:
Hero shows a pair of kings(Kh Qc).
MP2 shows high card king(Ts Js).
Hero wins with a pair of kings(Kh Qc).
This hand is another spot where I decided to cold-call. The open-raiser was a bit more loose than a typical TAG and the BB was a total calling station. Usually I would fold this, but I decided to play it here.
The flop was a perfect floating spot. There are hardly any draws, so he usually puts me on a pocket or a set. If I hadn't hit the turn, I would have raised him due to his very high aggression values on all streets. He would usually have a hard time even continuing with his overpairs there and with his aggression, there are a lot of overcards he has to fold.
On the river, the decision gets a bit tougher. Does he think I would peel twice with a pocket pair and he can get better hands out with his overcards? Does he think I could call three times with a pocket against his overpair or AK hit on turn? I took quite a bit of my timebank, but in the end, I decided to call because he had taken so long to bet the river. Again, I think it was the right decision because of his extreme aggression values, but it was definitely a close one.
Hand 3
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (7 handed)
Known players:
[tg]BB$17.95:///////;MP1$10.00:///////;MP2$6.35:///////;MP3$8.80:///////;CO$10.00:///////;BU$10.80:///////;SB (Hero)$10.30:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is SB with 8:s, 8:c.
3 folds, CO raises to $0.40, BU folds, Hero calls $0.35, BB folds.
Flop: ($0.9) 4:d, 5:c, 7:s (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.60, Hero calls $0.60.
Turn: ($2.1) A:c (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $1.40, Hero calls $1.40.
River: ($4.9) 4:h (2 players)
Hero checks, CO checks.
Final Pot: $4.9.
Results follow:
CO shows two pairs, fours and threes(3s 3d).
Hero shows two pairs, eights and fours(8s 8c).
Hero wins with two pairs, eights and fours(8s 8c).
In this hand, the open-raiser is a normal TAG with quite a wide opening range. I have a low overpair on flop plus gutshot and he is conti-betting around 80%.
The turn brings the perfect card for him to barrel again, but I think his range is wide enough that the ace didn't hit him often enough for me to fold.
I think the main point of argument is the river. Obviously, he checked behind, but what if he bets? At the moment I played, I was calling again on the river. My reasoning here was that he would hardly bet anything that was an overpair again on the river due to the ace. Even if he had an ace himself, he would have a hard time betting again on this river unless he assumes I am capable of calling twice with a pocket.
I'm wondering now, though, whether he would even think that far - I now think that he would probably bet AJ+ again on the river, while he would probably not 3-barrel often enough for me to call against air. I fold would thus have been the better choice.
Hand 4
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]MP2$10.95:///////;MP3 (Hero)$18.30:///////;CO$5.15:///////;BU$16.05:///////;SB$9.00:///////;BB$10.10:///////;UTG1$11.30:///////;UTG2$11.85:///////;MP1$11.25:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 7:h, A:h.
4 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, CO folds, BU raises to $1.20, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.80.
Flop: ($2.55) J:s, K:c, 5:d (2 players)
Hero checks, BU checks.
Turn: ($2.55) 7:c (2 players)
Hero bets $1.50, BU calls $1.50.
River: ($5.55) T:c (2 players)
Hero bets $3.30, BU calls $3.30.
Final Pot: $12.15.
Results follow:
Hero shows a pair of sevens(7h Ah).
BU shows a pair of kings(Ac Kd).
BU wins with a pair of kings(Ac Kd).
Analysis here is really fast. The guy had a 3betting value of over 10%, he had 3bet me before quite a few times and I decided to make a stand. I however didn't take into account that his cbetting was close to 0. So, after betting on the turn once, I should just have given up the river.
The fact that he actually had AK this time doesn't mean much, but I'm still very insecure about calling 3bets oop (which is where you find yourself most of the time) against frequent 3betters. I don't like 4bet-bluffing too much, especially in late vs late position where my hand might actually still be good. Any advise here is definitely welcome.
Hand 5
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]BB$9.05:///////;UTG1$8.70:///////;UTG2$10.05:///////;MP1$19.55:///////;MP2 (Hero)$23.35:///////;MP3$5.25:///////;CO$10.00:///////;BU$5.65:///////;SB$12.80:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 8:h, 8:d.
2 folds, MP1 raises to $0.40, Hero calls $0.40, 5 folds.
Flop: ($0.95) 3:d, 5:s, 5:c (2 players)
MP1 bets $0.60, Hero calls $0.60.
Turn: ($2.15) 7:d (2 players)
MP1 bets $1.50, Hero calls $1.50.
River: ($5.15) 6:s (2 players)
MP1 bets $2.00, Hero calls $2.00.
Final Pot: $9.15.
Results follow:
MP1 shows two pairs, jacks and fives(Js Jc).
Hero shows two pairs, eights and fives(8h 8d).
MP1 wins with two pairs, jacks and fives(Js Jc).
This is a hand where my call-down went wrong and this is probably the kind of spot that costs me most money. We are in heads-up, so the call on the flop is standard I guess. Raising doesn't really make sense on this board because it looks too bluffy and I do have showdown value.
On the turn, my overpair is still an overpair, but I think it already gets close. He raised early, but even if he just puts me on a pair, I don't think he would fire twice very often because I probably wouldn't fold any overpair to that turn card.
On the river, his bet just SCREAMS give me value with your pair. Considering the opponent type (nitty, no moves at all), I should probably have folded this already on the turn. The argument that his river bet polarizes his range to bluffs and monsters doesn't really hold merit here, even though I level myself into thinking that too often, because this opponent is just on a level too low to realize that.
Hand 6
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]MP2$12.20:///////;MP3$8.40:///////;CO$11.90:///////;BU$20.70:///////;SB (Hero)$10.00:///////;BB$7.95:///////;UTG1$6.65:///////;UTG2$10.05:///////;MP1$12.75:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is SB with T:s, T:h.
UTG1 calls $0.10, 5 folds, BU raises to $0.50, Hero calls $0.45, BB calls $0.40, UTG1 calls $0.40.
Flop: ($2) 3:h, 3:d, J:h (4 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, UTG1 checks, BU checks.
Turn: ($2) 7:d (4 players)
Hero bets $1.20, BB folds, UTG1 calls $1.20, BU folds.
River: ($4.4) K:h (2 players)
Hero bets $2.20, UTG1 calls $2.20.
Final Pot: $8.8.
Results follow:
Hero shows two pairs, tens and threes(Ts Th).
UTG1 shows two pairs, jacks and sevens(7h Js).
UTG1 wins with two pairs, jacks and sevens(7h Js).
I kindof have to bet this turn to protect my hand and I bet the river small in the hope of getting paid by this calling station with a 7. But considering it now, the river is a very easy check/fold - he will sometimes call with worse, obviously, but he will have me beat so much more often and he will hardly ever bet on his own, so if he does, I'm crushed. It might be better to 3bet this pre-flop, but I think I had been 3betting a lot the last few hands and that's why I decided to just flat it this time.
Hand 7
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
Known players:
[tg]MP3$11.95:///////;CO$12.00:///////;BU$20.80:///////;SB (Hero)$10.00:///////;BB$6.85:///////;UTG2$10.10:///////;MP1$11.25:///////;MP2$12.75:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is SB with J:s, J:d.
6 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, BB calls $0.30.
Flop: ($0.8) 9:h, 9:d, K:d (2 players)
Hero bets $0.50, BB raises to $1.00, Hero calls $0.50.
Turn: ($2.8) 2:c (2 players)
Hero checks, BB checks.
River: ($2.8) 3:s (2 players)
Hero bets $1.20, BB calls $1.20.
Final Pot: $5.2.
Results follow:
BB shows two pairs, kings and nines(As Ks).
Hero shows two pairs, jacks and nines(Js Jd).
BB wins with two pairs, kings and nines(As Ks).
This was another blunder by me. I think his turn conti-bet percentage was very low, so it was very probable for him to be in check/call mode. I don't think he will call often enough with a lower pair to have a value bet here.
Hand 8
Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
Play hand
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Known players:
[tg]MP2$11.45:///////;MP3$10.60:///////;CO (Hero)$10.00:///////;BU$10.15:///////;SB$10.00:///////;BB$9.40:///////;UTG1$8.15:///////;UTG2$26.00:///////;MP1$10.00:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is CO with K:d, A:h.
5 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, BU calls $0.40, 2 folds.
Flop: ($0.95) 5:d, 3:h, 2:c (2 players)
Hero bets $0.60, BU calls $0.60.
Turn: ($2.15) T:d (2 players)
Hero checks, BU bets $1.40, Hero calls $1.40.
River: ($4.95) Q:h (2 players)
Hero checks, BU checks.
Final Pot: $4.95.
Results follow:
Hero shows high card ace(Kd Ah).
BU shows a pair of sevens(7h 7d).
BU wins with a pair of sevens(7h 7d).
In this hand, I was playing against a typical reg TAG, and I think it's a good example for a move I want to start using more often: check/raise turn with initiative. He will often be on a pocket pair here; of course sets are possible, too. He might even sometimes have a weaker Ax (which is why I called the turn). But he will have a very hard time continuing with his pockets to a turn check/raise, and even if he does, I have loads of outs. This would allow me to balance my turn check/raises with monsters (which i already do sporadically) and will become much harder to float me. I however have to be careful to only do this against opponents who do float from time to time, otherwise I might run into sets too often.
Well, that's it for the first session. Second session to follow after lunch :).