Hey guys this can probably be found somewhere in the site but I swear I can't find it -_-. Anyway, what do you guys recommend for starters? I wanna start in one of those, probably the one with the worst players of both, but with a good software (or at least a decent one hehe). Which do you recommend?
Notifications
Clear all
Questions and Answers
6
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
1,067
Views
5 replies
Full Party ![:]](https://www.pokerstrategy.com/_forum-runtime/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/emoticons/pokerstrategy-legacy/basics/pleased.gif ":]")
I guess FTP would be better for beginners because of the 27% weekly rakeback.
AMaA: The Good Life
:diamond:Follow me on Twitter @emanuelc16
The Education of a Modern Poker Player by TwiceT, jbpatzer & EmanuelC16
Thanks for the feedback guys :)! And I know this should go in Poker Software section but, there are too many programs... I kinda get messed up hehe which can you recommend? I know Holdem Manager is good, but does it show probabilities and stuff?
Hi,
I guess PartyPoker is softer, but Full Tilt Poker is having 27% rakeback and more tables.
You can use our PokerStrategy.com Elephant. At the beginning it is free and if you have more than 1000 StrategyPoints you get a full license. Other popular programs are Holdem Manager and PokerTracker 3.
If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
Best regards,
Hannes
This is only my opinion but personally I'd say FT because:
The graphics are better,
There is more traffic,
Wider choice of tournies,
Rakeback,
I could go on.....
I've played Party Poker and for some reason I just couldnt get along with the software.