Originally posted by k4ileb
in my opinion 27s and 45s are less reg infensted and are better for $. play 9man though cause i want fast games etc etc.
i can give you my ITM% on 9s . its about 40-45% but i will post the correct number when i log in in my computer.
imo if you do good at 27s and 45s keep playing them.
I find them quite easy going all the way up to $5 (have not tried to play higher) am grinding a bankroll up from $12 so have been playing $1 45s and $1.50 27s but I have noticed that I had to make some important adjustments.
The adjustments I had to make to play these $1 Mtts are the following:
Early Stage
--------------
1) Try to limp in with suited connectors, 22-99, AXs
Mid-late stage
------------------
1) Be aware which players do not understand stack sizes and bubble stage.
2) Call lighter and Shove tighter except if the blinds are tight then literally (stack sizes permitting) you can go ahead and shove any 2 cards.
When playing the $3 and $5 27s and 45s I can shove a lot wider because I know that a reasonable amount of players understand stack sizes so it's easy to pick on the medium stacks where as in the $1 Mtts they don't seem to have a fold button regardless!
@ Takeiteasy
My ITM is ~30% for 27s and just under that for the 45s although my ROI is 20%.
My ITM for the $1 is just under 40% and my ROI is 38.6%.
Would be good to sweat either of you sometime to see how you approach the 9mans as I would really like to play these due to the less amount of time it takes to complete as opposed to the 27s and 45s also like you pointed out you will also become far more familiar with the opposition and have more accurate reads.
Oh, how many are you multi-tabling? Im doing between 8-10 ATM.