[Closed] SNG from the small to high stakes (the next chapter)

Originally posted by gekitsios

Originally posted by tpoke
Did Sharkscope resolve their issues with FT coverage?

what do you mean?i use the search feature i dont think there is any problem with that :/

sorry.. been away lately..
I meant this: http://www.sharkscopers.com/news/community/news/update-our-fulltilt-coverage

It is with great disappointment that we here at Sharkscope must report that our coverage of FullTilt is currently compromised due to an apparent change in FullTilt's policy regarding data retrieval from their site.

By around mid March Sharkscope stopped working correctly at tracking my progress on 9man STT on FT.
I haven't played there lately so I don't know if anything changed on the subject.. Are your 9man games tracked correctly?

unfortunately not,but still is very important search tool

This hand is played against a reg:

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $160(BB) Replayer
SB ($1,201)
BB ($3,164)
UTG ($1,492)
Hero ($1,563)
UTG+2 ($840)
CO ($2,875)
BTN ($2,365)

Dealt to Hero Q♣ Q♦

fold, Hero raises to $320, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls $160

FLOP ($720) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣

BB checks, Hero bets $320, BB calls $320

TURN ($1,360) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠

BB checks, Hero bets $923 (AI), BB calls $923

RIVER ($3,206) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠ J♦

BB shows T♣ J♥
(Pre 15%, Flop 15.6%, Turn 90.9%)

Hero shows Q♣ Q♦
(Pre 85%, Flop 84.4%, Turn 9.1%)

BB wins $3,206

Please tell me if i am wrong but this is a terrible play

lol. bad regs are bad

Originally posted by gekitsios
This hand is played against a reg:

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $160(BB) Replayer
SB ($1,201)
BB ($3,164)
UTG ($1,492)
Hero ($1,563)
UTG+2 ($840)
CO ($2,875)
BTN ($2,365)

Dealt to Hero Q♣ Q♦

fold, Hero raises to $320, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls $160

FLOP ($720) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣

BB checks, Hero bets $320, BB calls $320

TURN ($1,360) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠

BB checks, Hero bets $923 (AI), BB calls $923

RIVER ($3,206) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠ J♦

BB shows T♣ J♥
(Pre 15%, Flop 15.6%, Turn 90.9%)

Hero shows Q♣ Q♦
(Pre 85%, Flop 84.4%, Turn 9.1%)

BB wins $3,206

Please tell me if i am wrong but this is a terrible play

I think both your preflop and flop bets are a bit too small. Especially on the flop, there are just so many turn cards you don't want to see (clubs, 9s, Kings, Aces), so betting around 500 into the pot of 720 seems to be a better option to me.

Nah, just don't play around with postflop with 10bb. U should get less respect with pushing rather than min raising. And if someone decides to call A and K on the flop are sooo bad. BB play sucks as well but but I think your play wasn't best as well.

Originally posted by chrupens
Nah, just don't play around with postflop with 10bb. U should get less respect with pushing rather than min raising. And if someone decides to call A and K on the flop are sooo bad. BB play sucks as well but but I think your play wasn't best as well.

it was a tight table and i wouldnt get value from pushing utg

is there any video which advices how we should review our game?

Originally posted by gekitsios
is there any video which advices how we should review our game?

HEM Filters in SNGs

Helps a bit but you'll need to come up with your own ideas about your possible leaks.

i already watched this, anything else?

I found a player that has 96% roi over 4k sample.How someone can do this?

i dont think its possible in 9man sngs...

Originally posted by gekitsios
This hand is played against a reg:

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $160(BB) Replayer
SB ($1,201)
BB ($3,164)
UTG ($1,492)
Hero ($1,563)
UTG+2 ($840)
CO ($2,875)
BTN ($2,365)

Dealt to Hero Q♣ Q♦

fold, Hero raises to $320, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls $160

FLOP ($720) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣

BB checks, Hero bets $320, BB calls $320

TURN ($1,360) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠

BB checks, Hero bets $923 (AI), BB calls $923

RIVER ($3,206) 8♣ 8♦ 7♣ 9♠ J♦

BB shows T♣ J♥
(Pre 15%, Flop 15.6%, Turn 90.9%)

Hero shows Q♣ Q♦
(Pre 85%, Flop 84.4%, Turn 9.1%)

BB wins $3,206

Please tell me if i am wrong but this is a terrible play

well You needed to push there pre flop, you let him to get that far;)

Originally posted by gekitsios
I found a player that has 96% roi over 4k sample.How someone can do this?

u must have forgot the filter...its impossible

Originally posted by stevegold87

Originally posted by gekitsios
I found a player that has 96% roi over 4k sample.How someone can do this?

u must have forgot the filter...its impossible

it is in 135 man but still it isnt very very big roi?

I update before the end of the day because i finally reached 1k milestone ♦ I am so happy but i need some advices in my graphs.I ll post a last 3 days graph and a liffetime graph.Here we go ♠_love:

Last three days graph:

My question here is:Should i worry that my red line is nearly in breakeven mode or most of times is common when you run good.Example 2-3 times I won AQvsKK and another two my JJ won vs AA.That should concern me or i should not give so much importance?

Lifetime graph:

I feel i am playing my A game but the red line really makes me wonder if i am doing something wrong

Moreover i calculated my earnings if i turn pro now and here are my results.
IF i play 12 sets every day then we have 12 sets*12 tables *30days* 0.5 rake * 27% rakeback=583.2$ earnings from rakeback
IF i have roi 4.5% which i think is very very little i think i could have over 5% then we have 12sets*12tables*30days*6.5$*4.5%=1263.6
Conclusion:Even in 6.50$ can someone be a pro and make a living but he need to put volume.Keep in my mind that i didnt include bonuses from like mid year,iron man bonuses and black card bonuses

Starting bankroll:150$
Current bankroll:1001$

PS Please tell me your opinion about the difference of green-red line in first graph.GL

Congrats on reaching 4 digit BR Keep up the good work

subscribing to this thread....good luck

Your long term graph demonstrates clearly that red and green lines show the same tendency, so don't worry about the short term one. Over a 70 games sample you just cannot justify how well you play based on your EV line. Just evaluate with Wiz and you will be fine

Originally posted by dexisss
Your long term graph demonstrates clearly that red and green lines show the same tendency, so don't worry about the short term one. Over a 70 games sample you just cannot justify how well you play based on your EV line. Just evaluate with Wiz and you will be fine

yes i ll see the video how to use sit n go wizard...The book you refer in your blog helped you or not?