Originally posted by Johnis
Hey Galvin. I have noticed that you advocate for balance preflop across pretty much all stakes (except for raising loose in SB, since people fold too much blind vs blind). The reasons are quite understandable - preflop is the most frequently played street, therefore the balance is most important here, as it will occur with the highest frequency.
However, postflop you advocate for the exploitable adjustment of being value heavy when barrelling for 3 streets in microstakes. I agree with the argument for this adjustment, since it is very rare to see big bluffs on the river in the micro stakes.
I am a NL 25-50 player, and in my experience people fold to flop cbets way too much, especially out of position. Assuming this, how differently (if) would you play a general opponent in such a situation in NL2, NL50, and NL200:
You are both 100bb, hero is BU, villain is BB
Flop is: 9s 7s 3c
Would you have a 3bet bluff range on such flop in NL2 ? I guess on higher stakes (NL50-NL200) it would make sense to 3b bluff hands like As3x, Ks3x or As8x.
Assuming that runout is: 9s 7s 3c Td 5c.
What range would you 3barrel and what would you do differently across the stakes against a check-raise on the river ?
1. The average player at NL2/NL50 bluff raises this flop texture way less than the average player at NL200. So you should probably be more inclined to 3b bluff at a higher limit. At the same time it would be ideal if you had some sort of default 3b flop ranges.
2. definitely bet/fold at NL2. At NL200 you should call vs aggro guys who will turn some 9X or 7X into a bluff.
KQ/KJ are probably decent candidates to 3-barrel, assuming you don't have any :ss. You block 9X and TX with the high kickers and I would assume that people call based on their kickers a lot.