Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] how stupid is this

9 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
1,308 Views
tcs35
Joined: 31.01.2009

i played a heads up sng, i took him down to 60 chips on the second hand. he went all in every hand after and i called each time. each time i had the best hand, i.e k9, a8, etc.. he eventually one like 5 all ins in a row and beat me.. stupid shit game..


8 replies

rigged obviously.


Pe4Ce2
Joined: 30.12.2008

That happens, its poker ...


OMG so incredible


bordzter
Joined: 03.08.2008

it happens.

i experienced it at times in some SNG ( i wont mention the site anymore)... was heads up and had him down to less than the blinds and he came all the way back...

and most of the time i have the upperhand... hands like AT, K9, AQ even...

anyway i have realized that its all pert of poker...

am not playing for a while now so i can recover from the massive downswing... am focused on reading the materials i patiently compiled and printed out from PS...


OUTRAGEOUS. You mean you actually called every single time?


andyb43
Joined: 23.07.2008

Originally posted by SheepMoose
OUTRAGEOUS. You mean you actually called every single time?

Me thinks you're onto somrthing here Holmes.............. :P


This is something I often notice, when I play heads up and someone got like 100 chip left he allways win the flips even 80/20 underdog


Mstlc
Joined: 14.03.2009

Originally posted by SheepMoose
OUTRAGEOUS. You mean you actually called every single time?

That's pretty standard afaik?

If you have your opponent covered 10:1 or more you should call with any 2 cards. Even with with 72 VS AK you still have 30-35% chance to win the pot.

Example from the original post:
In a 9man SnG on PS there's 13500 chips in play.
AI1: 13440 - 60 => 224:1
AI2: 13380 - 120 => 111:1
AI3: 13260 - 240 => 55:1
AI4: 13020 - 480 => 27:1
AI5: 12540 - 960=> 13:1

So calling all-in 5 times in a row with effectively any two cards is standard there afaik. Even if you get it in with 2 undercards every time vs 2 overcards it's quite likely that one of those hands will be on the 30-35% side rather then the 65-70% side.


Share: