65s on SB vs BTN, 3bet pot

I am gonna shove river for value out of high naked ace. If you check he will most likely check them behind. Dont see many 8 or 3 in his range. A8-A3 are the only one, maybe 88. But dont see what do you beat as well. So you can make a laydown here

If you compare it with the AA hand you 3bet sizing is now smaller and Cbet is really small.
Also you're Cbet on the turn with 2 pair is pretty big. Not sure it has to do with you're actual hand strength, but that makes both hands interesting.

I would shove the river as well. Now you are also prized in to call.

Cheers,
DK1987

Originally posted by SDK1987
If you compare it with the AA hand you 3bet sizing is now smaller and Cbet is really small.
Also you're Cbet on the turn with 2 pair is pretty big. Not sure it has to do with you're actual hand strength, but that makes both hands interesting.

I would shove the river as well. Now you are also prized in to call.

Cheers,
DK1987

I think my turn sizing looks like I'm betting a draw.

Originally posted by NapoleonBonaparte135
I am gonna shove river for value out of high naked ace. If you check he will most likely check them behind. Dont see many 8 or 3 in his range. A8-A3 are the only one, maybe 88. But dont see what do you beat as well. So you can make a laydown here

Check this out.

According to solver, 65s on SB is 0% 3bet vs BTN.

I think I learned something here.

3bet is not that bad if you have decent FE

Originally posted by NapoleonBonaparte135
3bet is not that bad if you have decent FE

I want to find out what the hand uploader mean for GTO Wizard. I'm starting to think that the stats are hand specific as in this case, 65s is never a 3bet preflop vs AKo.

solver read outs go by other players, playing like a solver. That doesn't happen very often. IF the BTN has a wide open range 3 betting 65s in SB isn't a bad exploit play. is rather good. As for hand I don't mind the check if you think villain will bet, but then you just need to call it off and not be afraid of the flushy..

and if not Jam away!!!

Wouldn't 3b pre
sizing is too big. 3b to 9 unless you have a nutty holding KK/AA

x/c flop. You have a pair + backdoor OESD
As played you can bet turn but not that big. We're not happy to get it in. I think you need to think more about "am i willing to go broke here" and if not, size down. Bet 1/2 max. If villian calls and the river isn't too bad, you can bet again for thin value.

Originally posted by DecMate
Wouldn't 3b pre
sizing is too big. 3b to 9 unless you have a nutty holding KK/AA

x/c flop. You have a pair + backdoor OESD
As played you can bet turn but not that big. We're not happy to get it in. I think you need to think more about "am i willing to go broke here" and if not, size down. Bet 1/2 max. If villian calls and the river isn't too bad, you can bet again for thin value.

I was willing to go broke here, and I thought I did until SD.

Wait, is AK now bluffing on river?

I mean, we should expect a 4B from AK pre.

It's not the worst spot on the turn i guess but betting that big, you just bloat the pot wayy too much. You may even get villain to fold AQ/AJ. And if villain jams over our turn bet, how can we call there? Most villains are not jamming AJ/AQ. They have all A5/6/4/ 4's 6's even 5's. At best he has a FD or AJ/AQ which still has equity vs us, at worst we're drawing dead.

I think you just make the spot alot more difficult for yourself betting this big. I wouldn't race to get the money in in this spot.

Originally posted by DecMate
I mean, we should expect a 4B from AK pre.

It's not the worst spot on the turn i guess but betting that big, you just bloat the pot wayy too much. You may even get villain to fold AQ/AJ. And if villain jams over our turn bet, how can we call there? Most villains are not jamming AJ/AQ. They have all A5/6/4/ 4's 6's even 5's. At best he has a FD or AJ/AQ which still has equity vs us, at worst we're drawing dead.

I think you just make the spot alot more difficult for yourself betting this big. I wouldn't race to get the money in in this spot.

Yeah, I guess so. I thought two pair was the nuts at the time but I could've been wrong too.