[Closed] NL10 SH - TT vs 3bet from short stack

Hello Tosh5457,

But well, you were saying that he had tight stats. Although you are still putting him a range of 9-10%? I really doubt that. Would be great to hear what kind of stats. If he had something near SSS stats then I'd rather fold the hand, doubt we are getting 42% equity against that kind of range which is needed.

Best regards.

Originally posted by veriz
Hello Tosh5457,

But well, you were saying that he had tight stats. Although you are still putting him a range of 9-10%? I really doubt that. Would be great to hear what kind of stats. If he had something near SSS stats then I'd rather fold the hand, doubt we are getting 42% equity against that kind of range which is needed.

Best regards.

The problem is that HE doesn't show the stats I had at the time of the hand... I had few hands at the time. In fact writing the stats here is useless most of the time I think, because when the hand occurred we didn't have the stats we post here.

Hmm but how do we only need 42% equity? How do you do that calculation?

Pot is (with his all-in) = $3,40 ($0,40 + $0,15 (blinds) + $2,85 (opp. stack))
For us to Call = $2,45

Equity = $2,45/($3,4+$2,45) = ~42% equity which includes rake.

Originally posted by veriz
Pot is (with his all-in) = $3,40 ($0,40 + $0,15 (blinds) + $2,85 (opp. stack))
For us to Call = $2,45

Equity = $2,45/($3,4+$2,45) = ~42% equity which includes rake.

Ah ok thanks

Originally posted by veriz
Pot is (with his all-in) = $3,40 ($0,40 + $0,15 (blinds) + $2,85 (opp. stack))
For us to Call = $2,45

Equity = $2,45/($3,4+$2,45) = ~42% equity which includes rake.

Hmm but you're assuming we're the ones who're gonna call, but we're gonna 4bet. It's like betting pot has to result 50% of the times to be EV+, but a call against a pot bet only has to win the hand 33% of the time to be EV+.

No, I assume that the guy is going broke anyways with his stack.