Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL2 deep: second nut flush on 4 flush board, villain bets pot

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
266 Views
briccius
Joined: 26.06.2007
Oldschool Grinder

Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

Play hand

$0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

Known players:
[tg]SB$4.58:///////;BB$7.52:///////;MP2$4.06:///////;MP3$3.80:///////;CO$3.74:///////;BU (Hero)$5.27:///////;[/tg]

Preflop: Hero is BU with Q:h, Q:d.
MP2 folds, MP3 calls $0.02, CO folds, Hero raises to $0.15, SB calls $0.14, 2 folds, MP3 folds.

Flop: ($0.34) 6:h, 7:h, 3:c (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.38, SB calls $0.38.

Turn: ($1.1) 8:h (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($1.1) K:h (2 players)
SB bets $1.12,

Spoiler

Hero calls $1.12.

Final Pot: $3.34.
Results follow:

Hero shows a flush, king high(Q:h Q:d).
SB shows a flush, ace high(J:h A:h).

SB wins with a flush, ace high(J:h A:h).

I won´t be good here 33% of the time vs unknown, so folding seems best. Or does it?


Reply
Quote
2 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010
PokerStrategist

If you need 33% to continue, you get exactly 33%pot odds.


Reply
Quote
Tomaloc
Joined: 17.01.2011
Oldschool Grinder

he said he won't be good 33% of the time.
i'm not sure whether that is true, i'd end up snapping because it's probably the GTO thing to do... we don't really know the opponent, we have a top tier bluffcatcher, i don't see that many A:h in his range. that said, i guess that if villain is some kind of reg it's very possible that in average they have 0 bluffs in this spot...


Reply
Quote
Share: