Originally posted by pguest
Originally posted by srichards
I use to raise Aces. In a few days, I will post my Poker Tracker results of limping Aces vs raising Aces.Do you have a huge sample size, from all positions, using the 2 strategies, so the comparison would be meaningful?
Of course he does! He's been playing 10 years of this advanced strategy, im sure he'll provide the statistical evidence to back up his argument!
Originally posted by DecMate
Originally posted by pguest
Originally posted by srichards
I use to raise Aces. In a few days, I will post my Poker Tracker results of limping Aces vs raising Aces.Do you have a huge sample size, from all positions, using the 2 strategies, so the comparison would be meaningful?
Of course he does! He's been playing 10 years of this advanced strategy, im sure he'll provide the statistical evidence to back up his argument!
Yes, I have been playing sporadically for 10 years. But, I only changed my strategy to limp Aces and other starting hands a few months ago. I decided to delay providing Poker Tracker statistics until I obtain a sufficiently large sample size. Now, that may take some time because I only play two hours per day. However, I strongly agree with pguest that my statistics will be most meaningful with an adequate sample size.
Lol they sure will my dude. And once you obtain this statistical proof you will undoubtedly rewrite the core essence of poker strategy itself. I can't wait.
Originally posted by DecMate
Lol they sure will my dude. And once you obtain this statistical proof you will undoubtedly rewrite the core essence of poker strategy itself. I can't wait.
DecMate, why the sarcasm? Is it possible that there is more than one way to be successful at poker? There are other winning players with more experience than I who love to limp. Perhaps, it is best to keep an open mind.
