ZOOM AA vs aggression

Villains min raise on the turn he/she is committed to the pot.
Without any info I would most likely shove the turn. If you call like now you can't fold on a river shove ether.

Cheers,
SDK1987

There's a lot you beat. I would have liked to get it in on the turn, but then you might fold all villains bluffs, but the river looks like a safe card so I am calling it off.

This is the range I am thinking.
PP range you beat
QQ, KK, JJ, TT, and AK, AQ, AJ, AT,
98s, 9Ts, J9s, Q9s, K9s, A9s
76s,

FD range you beat + pair
JdTd, QdTd, KdTd, Td8d
Jd7d, Qd7d, Kd7d,

Range you don't
99, 77, 44, 22,
97s
65s

I don't expect any bluffs in villains range on NL2 with in mind he/she shouldn't ever fold for $1,16 more if you shove the turn. Off course random villains on NL2 are unpredictable.

If you're going to call a river shove it is better to shove the turn — either lead or x/r, than play passively.
This is why the TAG — tight aggressive style works.

Although you sill may lose this hand, overall it is the better play.

I see that opponent has a lot of worse overpairs, and more importantly, has a lot of bluffs.

I shove that turn 100% of the time and 90% of the time I regret it.

The key on this spot, for me, is the villain PF vs Turn actions. Accounting for the values on turn, river is a blank.
OTT, a villain that would do that play with TT/JJ/QQ would've 3betted you PF, or at the very least enter with a raise being first in. Same way any strong FD would've raised you OTF.
His play screams pocket that turned into set. As said, I call, but I cry.

Originally posted by yangmartins
I shove that turn 100% of the time and 90% of the time I regret it.

I agree, except I regret it only 80%