Originally posted by Dawidas888
Hi Jared,To begin with, I loved reading the Mental Game of Poker book as it appeared that I am a bigger mental game fish than I thought. It have me a great confidence boost to tackle my issues which don't appear as scary and unique anymore.
I wonder if you could have a look at my mental hand history as I am not sure if my understanding of 'why the logic is flawed' and 'why is the correction correct' good.
MISTAKE TILT
1. Describe the problem.
I go on tilt when I make a bad play which I didn’t carefully think through or where I ignore stats that are too low for a good sample but which would change my decision.2. Why does it make logical sense that you would react, think, or feel that way?
Because I think that only bad players make mistakes and good players don’t.3. Why is that logic flawed?
I ignore the reality that one cannot account for all the facts in a limited time period. In essence I believe that the more I learn the fewer mistakes I will make.4. What is the correct way to handle the situation?
Regardless of how much I learn, mistakes will always happen because when I learn I start noticing mistakes where I didn’t notice them before. Therefore, the better I play the more marginal spots I will get myself into. The bigger mistake is letting one turn into more.5. Why is that correction correct?
Poker is the game of incomplete information so mistakes are bound to happen as I will never have all the information. Therefore, when I make a mistake there is nothing else I can do about it so I should keep my focus on what I can do, which is play the next hand well.Thanks again for writing such a great book!
David
Hi David!
Thanks for the good words about the book.
I like your answers for steps 3-5. It's been a while since you first wrote about it, and I'm wondering if you solved it? What's the results been for you in handling mistakes since - that's the ultimate measure of how well you did - regardless of what my opinion may be. If you haven't solved it to the degree that you would have liked. It may meant that there were additional layers of the problem that were not known at the time you wrote this MHH. Post some more details about what you found and I'll give you some additional feedback.
All the best!
Jared