Skip to forum
Midlife Crisis? Wha...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Midlife Crisis? What Midlife Crisis?

8,661 Posts
251 Users
37 Reactions
787.4 K Views
EmanuelC16
Joined: 02.01.2010

Originally posted by bennisboy

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by bennisboy
Altho you being a maths genius means you should crush poker, if you don't, I will be mad at you

As you will learn if you buy the book, one of the greatest geniuses of the 20th century, the father of Game Theory and the first person ever to analyse a simplified model of poker, was a fish.

Poker is hard. It's official.

What? Nooooooooooo :f_cry:

Do you think it's helped you to progress though? I imagine it helps you analyze the situation and EV a bit quicker.

Lol, yeah right!


Reply
Quote
jbpatzer
Joined: 23.11.2009

Originally posted by EmanuelC16

Originally posted by bennisboy

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by bennisboy
Altho you being a maths genius means you should crush poker, if you don't, I will be mad at you

As you will learn if you buy the book, one of the greatest geniuses of the 20th century, the father of Game Theory and the first person ever to analyse a simplified model of poker, was a fish.

Poker is hard. It's official.

What? Nooooooooooo :f_cry:

Do you think it's helped you to progress though? I imagine it helps you analyze the situation and EV a bit quicker.

Lol, yeah right!

If it was all maths I'd no doubt crush. The fact that I don't should tell you something.

I took my daughter swimming this afternoon (I swear she's going to drown me one day), then came back and watched Goldfinger. It was much worse than I remembered it - really rather crap. Just totally implausible and silly. Maybe they're just all rubbish after this one. :f_cry:

I'm going to play 180 man MTTs tonight because I've got the MTT bug after my trip to DTD this week.


Reply
Quote
TwiceT
Joined: 15.07.2007


Reply
Quote
jbpatzer
Joined: 23.11.2009

Thanks TT. MTTs confirmed rigged.

I've had lots of final tables, but never actually managed to win one before, so I'm pretty chuffed, even if it wasn't exactly a high roller event. Felt like I pwned pretty hard HU, but then I would say that. Good job it wasn't Misclick that I had to play.

I'm off to London tomorrow evening, then Switzerland the following morning, so I'll be away until Wednesday night. I'll probably play with the Zimmers on Thursday, depending on how much tlc mrsjb seems to require after three days on her own with the kids, then back to sorting out example hands for the book from Friday.


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Wow! Congrats jb.
There'll be no stopping you now...


Reply
Quote
gadget51
Joined: 23.06.2008

Very nice jb, I don't think the stakes are so important, we're not Tim64. It just feels good sometimes to bink one, any one! :heart:


Reply
Quote
JimmyChooEsq
Joined: 09.04.2011

Great result!


Reply
Quote
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Love to see this! WD.

But mind what you say about Goldfinger. It's one of the few bond movies that's a good film in its own right, imo.


Reply
Quote
MisClick
Joined: 30.05.2008

Well, it is very nice to see all those heads up matches taught you something :coolface:

Now seriously, well done :f_love:


Reply
Quote
jbpatzer
Joined: 23.11.2009

Originally posted by Tim64
It's one of the few bond movies that's a good film in its own right, imo.

It has its moments, but the plot is just completely stupid. In terms of female character names, I'd agree that it's one of the best, although Diamonds Are Forever runs it close in that department. (Plenty O'Toole > Pussy Galore, but it's close).


Reply
Quote
doctorkgb
Joined: 01.04.2009

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by Tim64
It's one of the few bond movies that's a good film in its own right, imo.

It has its moments, but the plot is just completely stupid. In terms of female character names, I'd agree that it's one of the best, although Diamonds Are Forever runs it close in that department. (Plenty O'Toole > Pussy Galore, but it's close).

You just need to watch it on your old TV.


Reply
Quote
mineriva
Joined: 30.04.2008
Reply
Quote
MisClick
Joined: 30.05.2008

Originally posted by mineriva
poker stars is rigged

+1

Spoiler

I almost forgot, surely you know what you are doing with your winnings, right?


Reply
Quote
gadget51
Joined: 23.06.2008
jbpatzer
Joined: 23.11.2009

Look! You can be smart and sexy and still get down on your hands and knees and scrub the floor with a smile on your face. Vacuum cleaners are an unnecessary luxury imo. How much does one of these cost?

Btw, I have so much to do before I go away today that I have Skype off....,yet here I still am. :facepalm:


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by MisClick

Originally posted by mineriva
poker stars is rigged

+1

+2

Poker Stars, $30 Buy-in (125/250 blinds, 30 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: 1,285 (5.1 bb)
BB: 16,555 (66.2 bb)
UTG+1: 16,264 (65.1 bb)
UTG+2: 10,574 (42.3 bb)
MP1: 2,013 (8.1 bb)
MP2: 6,598 (26.4 bb)
MP3: 17,804 (71.2 bb)
Hero (CO): 2,280 (9.1 bb)
BTN: 13,349 (53.4 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q Q
UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 raises to 500, 3 folds, Hero raises to 2,250 and is all-in, 3 folds, UTG+2 calls 1,750

Flop: (5,145) 8 6 J (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: (5,145) K (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: (5,145) 2 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results:

Spoiler

5,145 pot
Final Board: 8 6 J K 2
UTG+2 showed 2 2 and won 5,145 (2,865 net)
Hero showed Q Q and lost (-2,280 net)


Reply
Quote
bennisboy
Joined: 11.04.2011

Congratulations on the ship


Reply
Quote
jbpatzer
Joined: 23.11.2009

Originally posted by Spungeh

Originally posted by MisClick

Originally posted by mineriva
poker stars is rigged

+1

+2

Poker Stars, $30 Buy-in (125/250 blinds, 30 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: 1,285 (5.1 bb)
BB: 16,555 (66.2 bb)
UTG+1: 16,264 (65.1 bb)
UTG+2: 10,574 (42.3 bb)
MP1: 2,013 (8.1 bb)
MP2: 6,598 (26.4 bb)
MP3: 17,804 (71.2 bb)
Hero (CO): 2,280 (9.1 bb)
BTN: 13,349 (53.4 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q Q
UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 raises to 500, 3 folds, Hero raises to 2,250 and is all-in, 3 folds, UTG+2 calls 1,750

Flop: (5,145) 8 6 J (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: (5,145) K (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: (5,145) 2 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results:

Spoiler

5,145 pot
Final Board: 8 6 J K 2
UTG+2 showed 2 2 and won 5,145 (2,865 net)
Hero showed Q Q and lost (-2,280 net)

Unreal. Who would have thought he could win with 20% equity after he had assumed that he had the 33% equity he needed to call given the pot odds that resulted from the teeny tiny stack you'd allowed yourself to get blinded down to. Outrageous! You are soooooo unlucky. Or maybe he did have 33% against your range. Hmmmmmmm. :f_confused: :pokerface:


Reply
Quote

nice result jb :-)


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by Spungeh

Originally posted by MisClick

Originally posted by mineriva
poker stars is rigged

+1

+2

Poker Stars, $30 Buy-in (125/250 blinds, 30 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: 1,285 (5.1 bb)
BB: 16,555 (66.2 bb)
UTG+1: 16,264 (65.1 bb)
UTG+2: 10,574 (42.3 bb)
MP1: 2,013 (8.1 bb)
MP2: 6,598 (26.4 bb)
MP3: 17,804 (71.2 bb)
Hero (CO): 2,280 (9.1 bb)
BTN: 13,349 (53.4 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q Q
UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 raises to 500, 3 folds, Hero raises to 2,250 and is all-in, 3 folds, UTG+2 calls 1,750

Flop: (5,145) 8 6 J (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: (5,145) K (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: (5,145) 2 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results:

Spoiler

5,145 pot
Final Board: 8 6 J K 2
UTG+2 showed 2 2 and won 5,145 (2,865 net)
Hero showed Q Q and lost (-2,280 net)

Unreal. Who would have thought he could win with 20% equity after he had assumed that he had the 33% equity he needed to call given the pot odds that resulted from the teeny tiny stack you'd allowed yourself to get blinded down to. Outrageous! You are soooooo unlucky. Or maybe he did have 33% against your range. Hmmmmmmm. :f_confused: :pokerface:

I hadnt allowed myself to get there.. I had just lost AJs v QJo :) and that was the next hand.. eat shit and die


Reply
Quote