Originally posted by katewalker1
Great coaching, for me one of the best ever.![]()
thanks
Originally posted by katewalker1
I've taken the first hand in my database:
UTG is a 21/15, opens from UTG (RFI from UTG=20%). There is a superfish on the bb, so I think I can flat more hands than the normal. My call-range can be a sort of this :
what do you think about?
Here comes the flop:FLOP: Ts 6h 4h
Now, he cbets 2/3 pot. He folds 50% to raise cbet, and he cbets 78%, with only 27% on the turn (not so many hands, 700). I think I can have a good raising range:
value: 44,66,TT = 9 combos
bluffs: 87, 98, JT, QJ without FD, [12], AJ without backdoor FD [2], some A2s-A5s.Is that right? Another hands I could add on the bluff range?
Another question. If villain doesn't fold to cbet-raise (assuming fold to cbet raise = 35-40%) I should eliminate the bluff range, or reduce the ratio bluffs: value from 2:1 to 1:2. Do you agree?
And what hands can I add for value? Th 9h, Jh Th, Ah Th, JJ? Should I do it?Sorry for all these questions, I want to understand if I'm not too wrong
First of all, if there is a whale in the BB and UTG is opening 20%, I would be flatting quite a few more hands than that--I would add all suited aces, suited broadways, AJo, and a few more suited gappers/connectors (T8s+, 76s, etc.).
When you are talking about the flop, I am assuming the BB folded pre-flop and you are heads-up with UTG? At first glance, the raising range you have constructed seems decent. Even when someone is folding more like 40% to flop raises, you can still probably have about a 2:1 bluff:value ratio. When someone is folding over 50% you can add even more bluffs, so in this spot I would probably add some more hands including J9ss, Axss, maybe AhJx, etc.
You usually shouldn't be adding top pair weak kicker hands to your value raising range in single-raised pots without a specific dynamic. The less often someone folds to raises, the more aggressive you will have to be on later streets with your air, because they will be getting to turns and rivers with a wider range that may include 2nd or 3rd pair, etc. You still don't need to stray too far from the 2:1 bluffs:value ratio; I would only want more value than bluffs if someone was almost never folding, or against someone who always check/folds the turn after cbetting the flop (in which case we can float with all the hands we would bluff-raise with).
I hope that answers all your questions?
