Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Was this play a little too risky?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
241 Views

Full Tilt Poker, $0.05/$0.10 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BTN: $9.80
Hero (SB): $12.75
BB: $3.65
UTG: $10.15
MP: $10
CO: $28.40

Pre-Flop: 3♦ T♦ dealt to Hero (SB)
4 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, BB calls $0.30

Flop: ($0.80) J♦ 4♥ 4♦ (2 Players)
Hero bets $0.40, BB raises to $1.20, Hero raises to $12.35 and is All-In, BB calls $2.05 and is All-In

Turn: ($7.30) A♥ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: ($7.30) 9♦ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $7.30 Pot ($0.70 Rake)
Hero showed 3♦ T♦ (a flush, Jack high) and WON $6.60 (+$2.95 NET)
BB showed K♦ T♠ (a pair of Fours) and LOST (-$3.65 NET)

should i have played more passive or folded the draw


2 replies
generals007
Joined: 17.09.2007

1. I don't know why you raise with this hand.
2. After raise cbet would be ok i guess on that board. After he reraises it's a fold, you don't get implied because he's shorstacked.

gen


lokopussy
Joined: 19.09.2006

especially against a shortie very easy fold preflop. I would never raisr that unless my friend in the BB has a fold to steal of 90%+. Playability sucks and you get floatet to often. as played it seems you are always putting it in behind against a Jack and i dont think you have nough fold equity. Since its nut a flushdraw with at least one overcard Im folding there. I mean even with his shitty hand he was favorite.
cbet might induce him to bluff, its to small.