Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL100 FR: AK facing agression

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
cindy1985
Joined: 13.11.2007

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (8 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

saw flop | saw showdown

SB ($96.90)
BB ($116.70)
Hero (UTG) ($102.50)
UTG+1 ($145.40)
MP1 ($21.30)
MP2 ($100)
CO ($112.85)
Button ($42.90)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with A, K
Hero raises to $4, 5 folds, SB calls $3.50, 1 fold

Flop: ($9) A, 5, 3 (2 players)
SB bets $9, Hero calls $9

Turn: ($27) 4 (3 players)
SB bets $20, Hero calls $20

River: ($67) 8 (3 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

Total pot: $67 | Rake: $3

Villain is 22/8/65, agression factor = 1
I don't really know if i could fold here, althought it seems like an option since he usually isn't that agressive.
Do you think a bluff on the river here could be profitable? After all, I have been very passive, so the FD is likely, and since he is usually passive, I could guess he is not on a draw (although one can never knows... in this session I witenessed a 8/6/500 limps 83o UTG :))


2 replies
finchybg
Joined: 16.12.2007

a typical way to play this is to raise flop(he is very likely to fold, because donkbets usually mean weakness). On the turn I'd go for pot control and if he checks, i check behind(If he bets big, I may fold, but this is read dependant). I call river(check on turn very often induces a bluff) or check it behind again.

No point to bluff the river as played in my opinion.


Timor83
Joined: 08.06.2007

I probably raise/fold flop against this opponent.
As played: calling turn is fine ofc, and a river check behind is ok as well. He might be afraid for the flush with a better hand than yours and wants to go for a cheap showdown or bluff induce or something.