flush
Notifications
Clear all
A decent reg from the CO will call a 3bet with JJ-99, ATs+, AJo+, KJs+, KQo, JTs, T9s and some AKs-combo's, some AA, KK, QQ-combo's. 98s is not really is his range, but I think that is the most probable hand here.
The flop is JTx and he will check if he doesn't have an overpair or didn't hit a pair or a draw or GS.
So we can tighten his range to 99.
Maybe this reg is so tight that he doesn't bet a draw or a pair. Then AQ and AK are still in his range. Then all T are still in his range.
On the turn he will call a donkbet if he has a pair or a draw.
On the river he will call with 2ndPair or better.
If he should have made a pair J or T he would have bet the flop probably. Maybe a tight reg doesn't cbet a 2ndPair?
If he had hit his FD with AsQs, AsKs he probably would have raised on the river.
99 as 3rdPair he will probably fold on the river if the 3suit arrives.
I put him on 9s8s. He calls with a FD and an OESD on the turn. He hit his mediocre flush on the river and that is why he calls and not raises.
Hardest of all hands tbh 
i dont know the answer :appl::appl::appl::appl: I will leave this for others 
CO did not bet on Flop so he got no T nor J, but I think a 6.
Hero raised on turn - CO knew he wont do that with a flush draw.
Because 2 or 5 are lower than his 6 and he also called the final bet.
CO got :Ax::6x: - but no flush.
bb ha A-10 gioca sempre passivo in quanto non ha top pair, tuttavia pensa (giustamente) che hero non abbia J-X
AQ Suited. Se permite pagar unas suma alta para el turn. Lo que me lleva a pensar que tiene un proyecto muy fuerte en este caso proyecto de escalera cerrado y proyecto de color que finalmente se completa en el river. Ahora. Cuando sale el flop es claro que el villano no conecta con el flop ninguna carta, puesto que no hace apuesta de proteccion,por lo quevillano sabe que tiene el mejor proyecto. tambien intenta optener una carta gratis para el turn y paga lo suficiente para ver su color completado en el river
I think CO (a LAG) have something like TT+ or AT+; the check-check in the flop don't permit to get more information preflop, the agressor barreled two times, in turn and river and CO just called (No flush draw nuts), CO shoud have won but with a pair, double pair, set or other weak flush. We have TT, JJ, QQ, KK, AA, ATos, AJos, AQos, AKos, KQos, QJos,KJos, KTos, JTos for CO, but some hands are difficult not to bet y flop for protection JTos or for increasing the pot as ATs AJs, AQs. Moreover, Hero has Ks, we can discard AKs, KQs and in some way QQ and KK are more unlikely. As a result, there is:
AA, JJ, TT, AJo, QJos, KJos. AA, JJ, TT and AJo has more sense in this hand; refining JJ, TT and AJo and my choice is A♠:J♣:
I think villain would have :Ax::Tx:. He calls 3 bet IP with a medium hand, and hits medium pair on the flop. So he checks behind as standard, and calls two barrels, because hero has many bluffes in his range because he would barrel on turn and on river. On river he can represent some flush
Q♠:Q♥:
A good reg wouldn't call a 3-bet with a non-broadway Axo, unless he's a maniac. It's not "just under your 3-bet calling range", not by a long shot. A non-broadway Axo doesn't play well in 3-bet pots, so I'm inclined to think villain has a hand like a pair or suited connector or gapper. AT or AJ would probably had bet something on the flop, because of fear of overcards, but not necessarily. Smaller pairs are also a possibility when deep enough, as in here. Suited broadways might play well too, but the comment "Not bad my friend, not bad..." implies that villain did not have Tx or Jx. Maybe low-middle pair or 77-99 with one spade. These are the hands that villain would open and call a 3-bet with. Also, they would check through the flop.
Now that I think of it, villain might also play TT-QQ preflop like this, too, because of position. A good reg wouldn't probably 4-bet these.
One more hand that fits the betting pattern is 9♠:8♠:. Think about it. He's not inclined to bet on the flop, but he has to call with 12 outs on the turn even when hero bets 2/3 pot. He shouldn't raise on the river because only better flushes would call.
FLOP: It doesn't matter much if villain flops trips or overpair, he'll probably check behind to trap the 3-bettor. If he has a smaller pair, he's probably checking behind with those, too, so we learn nothing here.
TURN:
-The turn doesn't change anything, so villain has to call. If villain had flopped trips, he'd probably bet big now. So I'm discarding the big sets, but not the QQ.
RIVER:
-There are virtually no other draws that got there on the river except the flush.
-The board is missing all high cards
-The third spade is an excellent bluffing card for hero because he has a spade blocker
Therefore, villain has an easy hero call with 77-99 as it is a good bluffcatcher hand, losing practically only to Jx and Tx and the odd flush. With Q♠::Qx: he's probably not raising, but certainly calling. He might raise, too, since if hero had a flush draw on the flop, he'd probably had fired.
So I'm guessing villain has a pair 7♠::7x:, 8♠::8x:, 9♠::9x: or Q♠::Qx:. I'm discarding the 9♠:8♠: because of only one combination.
