IPoker, $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 4 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
SB: $4.77 (119.3 bb)
Hero (BB): $4 (100 bb)
CO: $1.70 (42.5 bb)
BTN: $4.02 (100.5 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 9♦: 9♥:
2 folds, SB raises to $0.12, Hero calls $0.08
Flop: ($0.24) 6♠: Q♠: 3♥: (2 players)
SB bets $0.16, Hero calls $0.16
Turn: ($0.56) 5♣: (2 players)
SB bets $0.39, Hero calls $0.39
River: ($1.34) J♦: (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks
Results:
Spoiler
$1.34 pot ($0.08 rake)
Final Board: 6♠: Q♠: 3♥: 5♣: J♦:
SB showed Q♥: 4♥: and won $1.26 ($0.59 net)
Hero mucked 9♦: 9♥: and lost (-$0.67 net)
Villain ist unkown, aber eher loose und hat einige aggressive Moves gezeigt.
Preflop kann man das sicher 3betten, allerdings will ich ohne konkrete Reads mit der Hand nicht preflop broke gehen oder auf ne Bluff 4bet von ihm die beste Hand weglegen. Auch Postflop spielt sich 99 im 3bet Pot eher schlecht. Deshalb calle ich lieber in Position.
Wenn ich das so spiele ist der Flopcall Standard. Da er eher aggressiv war calle ich auch die Turnbet auf die Blank nochmal. Spielt ihr das anders?
-----
Villain is unknown but rather loose and showed a few aggressive moves.
Preflop you can probably 3bet, but I dont want to go broke with that hand without concrete reads and also dont want to fold IP against a bluff 4bet. Also 99 doesnt play that well in 3bet pots why I preferred to call IP.
The flop call then is a standard play. Since he was quite aggressive before I also call on that blank card on the turn again. Do you play this differently and why?
