Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO100 TT77ss 3bet pot, getting fancy with top set

7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
539 Views
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Fairly active BU but no specific reads.

I think my hand make ok 3bet having some connectivity but could be close.

This flop I usually just pot if cbetting so I decided to check this time instead of sizing down. E.g. we have some total give ups that have no interaction on this flop. 77 also blocking some straight draws so went for x-c. Though could be better to just x-r but I think we want to have some top sets just calling.

Turn A kind of suck though as I doubt BU is barreling this often so I decided to just pot lead instead.

Game #2097842342: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 11:34:36 2024/05/28
Seated players
Seat 1: Hanatus (€142.60)
Seat 2: k_haukka (€100)
Seat 3: TuhmaRapu (€318.77)
Seat 4: greenpengu1n (€100)
Seat 5: AvundSjuka (€63.91)
Seat 6: Lakrids1 (€90.07)
Blinds and button
Lakrids1 has the button
Hanatus posts small blind €0.50
k_haukka posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Hanatus T♠:T♥:7♥:7♦:
Preflop
TuhmaRapu folds
greenpengu1n folds
AvundSjuka folds
Lakrids1 raises €3.50 to €3.50
Hanatus raises €11 to €11.50
k_haukka folds
Lakrids1 calls €8
Flop 4♥:T♣:3♦: (24€)
Hanatus checks
Lakrids1 bets €12
Hanatus calls €12
Turn A♦: (48€)
Hanatus bets €48


Reply
Quote
6 replies
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

I think my hand make ok 3bet having some connectivity but could be close.

right, spotted borderline hand here.

This flop I usually just pot if cbetting so I decided to check this time instead of sizing down. E.g. we have some total give ups that have no interaction on this flop. 77 also blocking some straight draws so went for x-c. Though could be better to just x-r but I think we want to have some top sets just calling.

agree. half-pot is just 8% action compared to 75% potting so I would simplify towards pot-only. checking top-sets makes sense, it´s somewhat a little slowplay / balancing play, solver also checks top-set frequently (50%).

Turn A kind of suck though as I doubt BU is barreling this often so I decided to just pot lead instead.

we do have a 15% leading frequency here whereas top-set indeed is a high frequency donk-bet (35%). Solver-approved so far.


Reply
Quote
Coach
Kyyberi
Joined: 09.07.2010

One of those days where we hate to see A after 3betting and repping AA.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Originally posted by Kyyberi
One of those days where we hate to see A after 3betting and repping AA.

Yes because we switched into a defensive mode and cannot just barrel with high frequency. But since we'd also check-call some AAxx that turn cards actually isn't that terrible for our range (villain should not be float bluff-betting a lot and he probably also is not bluffing too much with the A♦: potentially giving him SDV frequently).


Reply
Quote
Coach
Kyyberi
Joined: 09.07.2010

It's awesome for our range, but in the exact spot it sucks as most of the times it kills the action.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Originally posted by Kyyberi
It's awesome for our range, but in the exact spot it sucks as most of the times it kills the action.

+1


Reply
Quote
BunBun00
Joined: 13.09.2023

Perhaps the turn sizing is a bit too large. I would guess the solver would use smaller sizing.


Reply
Quote