Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO50 KK76ss turn line?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
66 Views
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

BB seems reggy type. I probably should mainly cbet flop but I would assume some of these KK+FD to also want to x-r. But yeah maybe bit stronger ones that also has straight draw and block more of continue range versus cbet. Anyway went with check, BB pots and went for pot x-r.

Turn is pretty ugly. We have bit below SPR 2 with 50€ behind. What would be your line on turn?

Game #2271409923: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 15:31:30 2025/06/23
Seated players
Seat 1: VlaDDDDDD (€39.64)
Seat 2: Ritaty (€63.05)
Seat 4: 7sonofa7son (€124.14)
Blinds and button
VlaDDDDDD has the button
Ritaty posts small blind €0.25
7sonofa7son posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Ritaty 7♠:6♥:K♦:K♥:
Preflop
VlaDDDDDD folds
Ritaty raises €1.25 to €1.50
7sonofa7son calls €1
Flop J♥:K♣:4♥: (3€)
Ritaty checks
7sonofa7son bets €3
Ritaty raises €12 to €12
7sonofa7son calls €9
Turn Q♠: (27€)
Ritaty?

Spoiler

checks
7sonofa7son bets €17.45
Ritaty raises €49.55 to €49.55, and is all-in
7sonofa7son calls €32.10
Showdown
River Q♣:
Ritaty shows 7♠:6♥:K♦:K♥:, Full House
7sonofa7son shows 8♥:T♥:A♥:T♠:, A Straight
Ritaty wins €124.60
Summary
Total pot €126.10 Rake €1.50
Seat 2: Ritaty: bet €63.05 and won €124.60, net result: €61.55
Seat 4: 7sonofa7son: bet €63.05 and won €0, net result: €-63.05

Decided to make sure I realize all of my equity with x-r. Now maybe chance of being versus nuts with nfd is pretty high actually so this could be bit of overplay. We could perhaps also bet like 1/3-1/2 pot and call shove on turn. Dont like potting as that makes it kinda easy for opponent to play perfectly. My idea with x-r was that I allow some non straight hands to perhaps stab and I will do fine versus straight (as long as its not with nfd).


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

SB is the only position we can deliberately cbet wide from OOP since BB's calling range is supposed to be wide. On KBx two-toned ie. we'd cbet with a 65% freq. which is more wide than other oop positions. I'd also say that most regs are not overfolding pre, something to keep in mind. So I would bet all top-set with exception of some low frequency checks when having an additional flush-/straightdraw. There's usually still a fit-fold gap otf so we benefit from being allowed to also bluff cbet a ton. SBvsBB is quite an exception in playing dynamics.

Since you have the FD, I agree with the XR. We are not supposed to XC any nuts. The Q♠: is a bad card for us generally spoken, it forces us back to passive defense mode (check turn). Most of our turned nutrstraights would still like to barrel pot putting a polarized pressure on villain taking advantage of the shift. To balance those out, we'd also include some top-set+fd which are a ~ 4:1 mix of check and bet. So here you can go either way.

Personally I would check with the K♦: which represents the second suit randomizer for turn play (with flushdraw/-blocker any would be excluded, since it would blurr randomization frequencies and the 7♠: would be "used up" in order to determine the flop check. So on any street to hit a 66% checking frequency I'd always check and ) Here with top-set+flushdraw it'd approximate towards solvers 79% check with that particular subcategory.


Reply
Quote