trips top kicker reraise F?

Posted by: @walkingdude

↑

Cau

I think I lost some blinds here. Flop raiser is reg

pre: can be

flop: blunder here. Make no sense to raise it here and even worse is reraise I guess. If he has something I will get it later on. I only expeled hit bluffs or worse cards which he might go on with betting

Next time call and jam it later on.

A lot depends on tendencies of the opponent but against an unknown, there's nothing wrong with raising that flop.  
The questions are:

• What worse will call?  Here there are a lot of overpairs, and AK, AQ and worse 9x hands that will.
• What better will fold?  Pretty much none.

So your idea of calling MP's flop raise, then getting it in later is sound.  

Would you check the turn or river to induce a bluff and risk MP checking behind?

Posted by: @walkingdude

↑

Cau

I think I lost some blinds here. Flop raiser is reg

"Cau" correctly Čau is Hello /Hi in czech language. I greet automaticaly this way all around although it makes no sense for EN forum ;-)

on T I would cbet, no inducing with check. Should I? 

thx

Posted by: @walkingdude

↑

"Cau" correctly Čau is Hello /Hi in czech language. I greet automaticaly this way all around although it makes no sense for EN forum ;-)

on T I would cbet, no inducing with check. Should I?

Čau 😁

Yup I would definitely continue the aggression.  So many worse will call.

Flop play is most interesting. Orginal pre-flop aggressor is making the check/raise in a multi way pot on a dry board is kind of suspicious move. I would most likely call the check/raise, but any move you make should look strong without any position on both villains. Calling out of position a check raise should look suspicious for a thinking player. Off course 3betting a check/raise you do get almost any weaker hand of villains range to fold. Even a over pair like AA should know it's beat now.

Cheers,

SDK1987

Тоже думаю что  модно было послуплеить.