Skip to forum
FullTilt vs Pokerst...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] FullTilt vs Pokerstars fishyness in SNG/NL/MTT

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
1,744 Views

After watching a video where lessthanthree and chenny were talking about which has softer SNGs between fulltilt and stars i started to wonder which site has more fish in game formats separately (you can consider all stakes)

Which has softer SNG's?
Which has softer cash games?
Which has softer Mtts?

(ill post my opinion after some answers)


8 replies
Alficor1
Joined: 16.06.2010

I've played NL2/5/10 on both sites and i have to say that FT seems more fishy than PS. ;)


I think both sites are about the same.
It all depends on the stakes you are playing. The lower you go the fishier.

However I have had more fishy calls on stars playing sit n goes then tilt.

Been called all in pre flop with 97 suited 10 6 suited etc
:f_eek:


easy one i have a good sample on both stars and ftp on the 9 man lets say 6.50$ buyin ftp is softer the stars and not only this buyin ftp is softer then stars my opinion, on ftp you still get people on your table that fold with one bb left.


_Anonymous_ Topic starter
_Anonymous_

i guess FT is just softer for everything


conall88
Joined: 02.01.2009

hey leito I knew I knew you from somewhere.

I was playing a 10 euro HUSNG vs you on IPN lol.

I think stars is gonna be , purely because the traffic is much larger.


_Anonymous_ Topic starter
_Anonymous_

haha
whats your name there?


in general, the smaller the site, the softer the field. regs hate low traffic coz they can't grind


conall88
Joined: 02.01.2009

JukeBox88

the sick MTT grinder

( when I can be assed)

:f_biggrin:

playing iCOP1 tomorrow. see you there maybe :)


Share: