Skip to forum
looking for backing...
 
Notifications
Clear all

looking for backing PLO $25 or PLO $50

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1,270 Views
ZakYoun270
Joined: 10.12.2015

I have read and accepted the staking rules. By posting in this thread, I understand that PokerStrategy.com does not take any responsibility for transactions made between the users.

Hello, I am looking for backing to play PLO $25 or PLO $50. I'm primarily interested in Bodog (also known as Ignition / Bovada) and Chico network where I play as WHYALLINDONK, but I am open to suggestions.

I can offer a straight 50/50 split of all profits, including any promotions.

A bankroll of 30-40 buyins should be enough to handle the common swings of PLO. That being said you do not have to supply me with all the buyins upfront, you could give me say 10 buyins to work with and reload me if I downswing, especially if you are online grinding throughout the day as well to be available for reloads. Most likely crypto would be the best way to facilitate buyins and cashouts. You could also review my hand histories at reload time in order to evaluate your investment.

I am looking to get staked because I had to cashout almost all of my bankroll recently to pay for some expenses.

here is my most recent sample. i went from PLO $10 to PLO $50 on Chico in a month. As you can see I won at EV bb/100 of 11 bb/100. The games are very soft, and I am familiar with the fields, I have stats on almost all the players so can quickly identify which games are profitable and which are not. I believe this would be a solid investment, as I can easily play 2000+ hands per day. at 10 bb/100 that is an expected win of 200 bb, 100bb which will be your share. So considering total exposure of your investment to be 4000 bb maximum, this would be an ROI of about 2.5% daily. And it has the potential to compound as well, because the PLO $50 and PLO $100 games are pretty soft.

To discuss this matter further please feel free to DM me.


Reply
Quote
5 replies
DoubleStandard
Joined: 13.10.2012

I have read and accepted the staking rules. By posting in this thread, I understand that PokerStrategy.com does not take any responsibility for transactions made between the users.

Hey buddy, I would be interested in staking you, sent you a friend request.:f_cool:


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by DoubleStandard
I have read and accepted the staking rules. By posting in this thread, I understand that PokerStrategy.com does not take any responsibility for transactions made between the users.

Hey buddy, I would be interested in staking you, sent you a friend request.:f_cool:

Hi DoubleStandard
You may already realize that the post is several months old.

In any case ...

Best of luck :gl:,
VS


Reply
Quote
Wolfhng777
Joined: 15.12.2023

.


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Hi Wolfhng777,
Welcome to PokerStrategy.com :welcome:

Had you read the staking rules, you'd realize that as a new member with no history here, you're currently ineligible for staking through PokerStrategy.com. Private deals can of course be made. The wrinkle there is that PMs can't be done until you have achieved at least bronze status.

Bear in mind that very few people would be willing to stake a complete stranger.

Now that you're a member, sign up with one of our affiliated poker rooms and you may even be able to take advantage of one of the bonus offers. There may even be some free money offers available to you. Not all offers are available in all regions. Once you meet the requirements, you can start your own staking thread. I'd say a good place to start building a reputation would be the Hand discussions for Omaha. You might also want to join the bankroll challenge. See more about that here: https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?postid=3255945#post3255945

You'll notice that I removed your contact info. Although our forum principles don't exactly forbid posting personal contact information, it is dangerous to do so in a public place.

All the best,
VS


Reply
Quote