BU 150 hands: 27/16, 3bet 12; cbet 8 out of 15; cbet 3betted 4 out of 7; AF 2.4; WTS 26
$0.25/$0.50 Zoom Pot Limit Omaha Hi
PokerStars
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG ($82.11) 164bb
Hero (UTG+1) ($70.57) 141bb
CO ($149.67) 299bb
BTN ($77.95) 156bb
SB ($118.18) 236bb
BB ($50) 100bb
Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) Hero is UTG+1 9♣ A♣ Q♠ 8♠
1 fold, Hero raises to $1.75, 1 fold, BTN raises to $5.50, 2 folds, Hero calls $3.75
Flop: 6♦ 7♥ 3♠ ($11.75, 2 players)
Hero bets $8, BTN calls $8
Turn: 8♥ ($27.75, 2 players)
Hero ($57.07)?
With the high flushcards I call preflop against an aggressive 3bettor.
Flop: I thought, a ch/r could be made with lower stacks(around 100bb), but I thought also, that his cbet-value is low, so I will seldom get the chance to ch/r. So I donked instead. The problem is, that this donk is not for value; and as he does not always a cbet I get information, when I check.
So I don't like the donk. Can you think of 3betted situations, where a donk could be good? (as bluff; for value?)
Turn: ch/c or ch/f: as this is a really bad Turn for me, I prefer the ch/f... a chb of him could also come often. When I really expect him to bluff, a ch/c would be possible, but I see no reason here.
Regards MGF
(or he alrdy has? dunno). But in general leading boards where you dont expect a lot of cbets is a nice option, for example in a 3way pot or low boards vs a really tight 3- and c-better.
