Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Learning to think in ranges: Hand 001

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
431 Views
kerith
Joined: 30.07.2015

Hi :)
I have decided it's time to learn to think in ranges, since it gives a huge edge in hand-reading in he micros (people are so honest there).

One of the fatal flaws of my game is the super stupid river calls. You know which ones. The "Nahhh, no way you have it" calls. That is costing me too much money, so I have decided to slow down my playing for a while, and focus on learning to read hands better, so I have reason to accompany my intuition.

This exercise is NOT to find out whether I should have called here or not (but feel free to comment on that), but to try and develop my range-thinking skills.

HAND 001
Known Players:
MP2: €2,74 - 55 bb
MP3: €3,57 - 71 bb
CO: €1,37 - 27 bb
BU: €5,44 - 109 bb
SB: €10,09 - 202 bb
BB: €4,20 - 84 bb

0.02/0.05 No Limit Hold'em ZOOM(6 Handed)
Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 2.1.20409.2

Preflop: Hero is BU with A♠, A♣
SB posts small blind (€0,02), BB posts big blind (€0,05), MP2 raises for €0,13, 2 folds, Hero 3-bets €0,35, 2 folds, MP2 calls

Flop: (€0,77 - 15.40 bb) 9♥, 9♠, 5♠ (2 Players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets €0,48, MP2 raises for €1,15, Hero 3-bets €1,82, MP2 4-bets €1,24, Hero calls

Turn: (€5,55 - 111 bb) K♠ (2 Players)

River: (€5,55 - 111 bb) 7♣ (2 Players)

Comment:

PREFLOP: A small raise from early position from the villain...

  • He has a big hand (AA, KK, QQ, AK) and is trying to get called or 3betted.
  • Has a pocket pair, and is trying to make it expensive to other pocket pairs and connectors to call, since he is shortstacked.
  • I don't think he has connectors, since then why not just complete the blind?
  • Also, Why is his bet sizing so small?
    That leaves us with the range: 55+, AT+, KJ+

I 3-bet, and he calls.

  • The call leads me to believe that he doesn't have AA, KK, AK or even QQ
  • Maybe he has a speculative hand, or a pocket pair, waiting to connect on the flop.
    Range: AQ-AT, JJ-22, KQ, KJ

Flop:
As the aggresor, and sice there is only 1 combo with nines in the range I think he has, I c-bet 2/3xpot for value.
He re-raises.
Now, I think he has trips or better, and I should have folded.


Reply
Quote
4 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

That leaves us with the range: 55+, AT+, KJ+
And after the 3 Bet: Range: AQ-AT, JJ-22, KQ, KJ

In what miraculous way did 22-44 appear in his range after the 3 Bet when they weren't in his opening range? :)

Now, first you should start using HEM or PT4 to get stats on villains.
Standard unknown UTG open range may vary but still it may look like this: 55+, ATs+, AJo+, KJs+, QJs+, JTs-98s, KQo. There can be KTs and QTs but it is player dependant.

After the 3 bet his range may be like this: QQ-TT ( maybe 99), AQs+, AKo. There can be AQo, AJs.


Reply
Quote
JCSeerup
Joined: 14.12.2010

I don't think it's unreasonable to open 22-44 and given his stack size I guess he's a fish which gives more merit for putting it in his OR, however I doubt he would 3b that OTF. Also given his stack size I guess he would jam QQ pre, so I would put him on JJ-99 (maybe 88-55), J9s, T9s, 98s.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

The "problem" is we did not give him 22-44 in his opening range but put them in the call 3B range. :)


Reply
Quote
kerith
Joined: 30.07.2015

I am sorry about the opening range mistake, I swear I have 22+ in my notes. A wizard did it!

Besides that, thanks for the help, it's greatly appreciated :) It is clear that I have no idea how to build ranges, any suggestion for that?


Reply
Quote