Everyone else at the table fairly tight so far except for BB.
PokerStars - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
SB: $10.95 (VPIP: 5.88, PFR: 3.92, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 52)
BB: $6.22 (VPIP: 55.56, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 18)
UTG: $15.54 (VPIP: 22.45, PFR: 14.97, 3Bet Preflop: 10.42, Hands: 153)
Hero (MP): $8.48
CO: $29.28 (VPIP: 17.24, PFR: 12.07, 3Bet Preflop: 6.52, Hands: 118)
BTN: $10.17 (VPIP: 21.82, PFR: 20.00, 3Bet Preflop: 10.53, Hands: 58)
SB posts SB $0.05, BB posts BB $0.10
Pre Flop: (pot: $0.15) Hero has T♣ T♥
fold, Hero raises to $0.30, CO calls $0.30, BTN calls $0.30, fold, BB calls $0.20
Flop: ($1.25, 4 players) 8♥ A♦ 6♥
BB checks, Hero bets $0.89, CO calls $0.89, fold, fold
Turn: ($3.03, 2 players) T♦
Hero checks, CO checks
River: ($3.03, 2 players) 2♠
Hero bets $1.44, CO calls $1.44
Hero shows T♣ T♥ (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 67%, Flop 15%, Turn 100%)
CO mucks 4♠ A♠ (One Pair, Aces)
(Pre 33%, Flop 85%, Turn 0%)
Hero wins $5.64
My thinking was that I would cbet post flop representing an
and if I got raised I would fold. Should I have done this against 3 other opponents out of position or just check/folded? I know more often than not someone will have an
but still felt the cbet was justified. When the :T hit on the turn and I had isolated CO, my thinking behind the check was to imply that my previous bet had been a bluff, hoping that villian would then bet himself. When he checked behind me, I bet 75% for value on the river.
Anyone's thoughts would be greatly appreciated!

