NL16 fold best hand against villian's strange move?!

I think I would go for bluffcatching. We cannot know for sure whether SB is incredibly weak or strong (polarized most probably). In mw pot we cannot know for sure whether we have the best hand with bottom set.

What bluffcatching with 2 draws on the board OTT?

I would not take aggression here but just x OTT and call off small bets.

Originally posted by Hesticus
I would not take aggression here but just x OTT and call off small bets.

What? No. Never.

Well played imo. You could not just start folding and bluffcatching with sets in 3bet pots. Villain could have had also 7♣:8♣: or other hand with good equity from which we want to get max value on the turn.

Originally posted by Hesticus
I would not take aggression here but just x OTT and call off small bets.

You are mw , you have a set, there are draws and cards that will kill the action and you prefer to check? This is a pure suicide, man.

So a bet in this situation is better? Would you have shoved here as well?

This hand was well played imo. This was just a cooler.
When we hit OTT we can't play it passively when there is 2 draws.

Originally posted by Hesticus
So a bet in this situation is better? Would you have shoved here as well?

Yes I would go broke. I definitely do not expect villain to check his top set twice = we should have the nuts here and play vs draws. We can happily go all-in vs draws.

Well played post flop. Luckily, position aided you and flop was checked around allowing you to hit your set on the turn. Afterwards you always go for stacks, even if raised, you have outs to quads and a full house and set against set is super rare. You fold a set on the river against 2 players if draws complete, usually. Cooler.

Pre-flop, what is the plan? Setmining? We are IP but we will not flop anything 80% of the time, apart from a set again. Fold, 4bet/fold? Thoughts?

Without using a calculator I would say we have the odds to call (only to setmine) because BB called too. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Originally posted by Hesticus
So a bet in this situation is better? Would you have shoved here as well?

Not only a bet but bet/shove.

Originally posted by la55i
This hand was well played imo. This was just a cooler.
When we hit OTT we can't play it passively when there is 2 draws.

Yes, this is the case. If we are not betting, Our preflop call them is wrong.

Originally posted by la55i
Without using a calculator I would say we have the odds to call (only to setmine) because BB called too. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I think it is of personal matter. I would call here.

Don't worry too much about going broke with sets unless the board is really awfult.

Call pre is fine when fish is in the pot. Otherwise folding 66 should be your standard 100bb deep. Standard xb/give up flop, yeah, don't want to try to get fancy on these limits. When facing the min raise I'd just call and call any river shuv except maybe a King. Allow him to bluff, you never know what's in someones head on these limits. When he's minraising here his range is mostly AK, KK, AA, so we'll get in the money anyways. On a king river he'd probably slow down with a hand like AQ/AJ that he might have decided he needs to protect or whatever OTT (micro stakes, right?) so calling turn and maybe once in a blue moon consider folding a king river or just call/shove any other. Assuming played as it is and saying he'll have just AK, KK, AA it's still a snap-super-happy-call. 6 combos AA/KK and 9 combos AK. 66 has 55.45% equity against this range.

His move was awful and not the board Otherwise I would have showed the river if he had called, or I would have called if he had shoved the turn. But this x/minr was very suspicious. But if he is so stupid to x twice when there is a big fish in the pot I did't really mind to go broke

Villain is hoping someone of you to start betting . Nothing wrong with that.
You played it well.

Yes, well played. I hope you catch the case 6 next time you meet him in the same spot :-))