Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

TPGK on dry board

9 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
880 Views
Tosh5457
Joined: 18.01.2008

Pacific Poker - €0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BTN): 123.4 BB
SB: 83.8 BB
BB: 111.8 BB
UTG: 46.6 BB
MP: 161.8 BB
CO: 171.8 BB

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has J♣ K♠

UTG raises to 2 BB, fold, fold, Hero calls 2 BB, fold, fold

Flop: (5.4 BB, 2 players) J♦ 6♥ 3♠
UTG checks, Hero bets 3 BB, UTG calls 3 BB

Turn: (11.4 BB, 2 players) 7♥
UTG checks, Hero bets 5 BB, fold

Spoiler

Hero wins 11 BB

Flop: I'm stealing here with air so I guess I need to bet.
Turn: Bet small to control the pot and take some value from pocket pairs. Maybe check back and bet river instead?


Reply
Quote
8 replies
Pokamon
Joined: 15.04.2006

you ve got the nuts. B, B, B vs QJ, JT, TT, 99, 88.


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by Tosh5457
Flop: I'm stealing here with air so I guess I need to bet.
Turn: Bet small to control the pot and take some value from pocket pairs. Maybe check back and bet river instead?

Top pair isn't "air" it is a solid hand, and you bet it solidly -- well done.
2/3 pot isn't "small" -- but it is the correct bet sizing in this spot. The goal here is to seize opponent's equity -- his hand can improve on the river, but you want him to pay for the privilege to draw.


Reply
Quote
Zaratras
Joined: 03.01.2009

Originally posted by VorpalF2F

Originally posted by Tosh5457
Flop: I'm stealing here with air so I guess I need to bet.
Turn: Bet small to control the pot and take some value from pocket pairs. Maybe check back and bet river instead?

Top pair isn't "air" it is a solid hand, and you bet it solidly -- well done.
2/3 pot isn't "small" -- but it is the correct bet sizing in this spot. The goal here is to seize opponent's equity -- his hand can improve on the river, but you want him to pay for the privilege to draw.

Nice hand review, helps me a lot too.
Since it was a min raise of villain from UTG. Would you 3bet KJs in this situation?


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by deuverman
Since it was a min raise of villain from UTG. Would you 3bet KJs in this situation?

I will mix it up, but generally no.

If players behind me are likely to squeeze, then yes.
If UTG is opening a lot of hands -- or opening weak hands then yes.

If UTG has a reputation for trapping by opening small-ish with big hands, then I would fold KJo


Reply
Quote
Zaratras
Joined: 03.01.2009

Originally posted by VorpalF2F

Originally posted by deuverman
Since it was a min raise of villain from UTG. Would you 3bet KJs in this situation?

I will mix it up, but generally no.

If players behind me are likely to squeeze, then yes.
If UTG is opening a lot of hands -- or opening weak hands then yes.
thank you
If UTG has a reputation for trapping by opening small-ish with big hands, then I would fold KJo

thank you


Reply
Quote
Pokamon
Joined: 15.04.2006

Originally posted by deuverman
Since it was a min raise of villain from UTG. Would you 3bet KJs in this situation?

all the time. also vs 3x.


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Well first off, since the original hand was KJo, and I didn't notice that the question as about KJs I apologise.
However I still mix up KJs as mentioned.

@Pokamon -- that chart seems to indicate that you do something 57% of the time w/ KJs -- is that call 57% and 3Bet the rest?
I presume that the green is 3Bet always.

Also, what limit is this considering?


Reply
Quote
Pokamon
Joined: 15.04.2006

green = 3bet, yellow = flat, number = 3bet %.

this chart is for 200 NL, but the chart for 25 NL looked very similar, when i last looked at it. i do not have it at hand though. usually it is tighter due to higher rake. KJs will be a 3bet nonetheless.

playing micros i would 3bet only, to avoid getting raked. very common advice nowadays.


Reply
Quote