Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO50 AKJ8ss 3bp 3way

7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
731 Views
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

iPoker - €0.50 PL Hi (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

BB: €110.25 (221 bb)
UTG: €139.85 (279.7 bb)
MP: €93.56 (187.1 bb)
CO: €50.00 (100 bb)
BTN: €108.45 (216.9 bb)
Hero (SB): €211.23 (422.5 bb)

Hero posts SB €0.25, BB posts €0.50

Pre Flop: (pot: €0.75) Hero has 8♦: K♥: J♣: A♣:
UTG raises to €1.00, 2 folds, BTN calls €1.00, Hero raises to €4.50, fold, UTG calls €3.50, BTN calls €3.50

Flop: (€14.00, 3 players) 2♣: T♥: 4♣:
Hero bets €7.00, UTG calls €7.00, BTN calls €7.00

Turn: (€35.00, 3 players) A♥:
Hero ?

UTG is a total maniac (75/45/14) broking all kind of mediocre hands in big pots.
BTN is a straightfoward tight regular (25/10). Would you keep betting 4value or check the showdownvalue?

Spoiler

Hero bets €26.25, fold, BTN raises to €96.95, Hero ?

Since BTN would have 4-bet AAxx preflop the A♥ is a pretty good card for our hand. The odds in case of a raise are not very good though and I wonder what if that is a call against a very solid player?


Reply
Quote
6 replies
PakerFace
Joined: 19.09.2010

I would bet the pot ott. We have a top pair, nut gutter and NFD + blocking the other NFD with our K♥:

I think we just have too much equity in this spot to be checking.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Betting 3/4 and pot is quite the same (in terms of EV and here in playability aswell). If I have a 3/4+psb you can consider it a pot-sized bet and vice-versa.

Ah yes true, the K♥ is sth I did not even notice.


Reply
Quote
PakerFace
Joined: 19.09.2010

I guess there's no difference here between 3/4 and pot. I didn't check the spoiler though. I didn't want my opinion to be influenced by the outcome.

Well played I guess.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Thanks for not "checking the solution beforehand". I did´t want that bias either.

Here is the final outcome:

Spoiler

Turn: (€35.00, 3 players) A♥:
Hero bets €26.25, fold, BTN raises to €96.95, Hero calls €70.70

River: (€228.90, 2 players) 5♠:

Results: €228.90 pot (€1.50 rake)
Final Board: 2♣: T♥: 4♣: A♥: 5♠:

BTN shows 9♥: 5♣: 7♣: 3♥:: (Straight, Five High)
(Pre 47%, Flop 42%, Turn 78%)

Hero mucks 8♦: K♥: J♣: A♣:: (One Pair, Aces)
(Pre 53%, Flop 58%, Turn 23%)

BTN wins €227.40

I did not account for 9♥:7♣:5♣:3♥:. :spit:

Always tricky to estimate the wheel possiblities in what supposed to be tight ranges.


Reply
Quote
PakerFace
Joined: 19.09.2010

I was about to mention 5 and 3 being the only hand that made it ott and the maniac could possibly have it. Turns out our straight forward regular had it. What a surprise...


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Originally posted by PakerFace
I was about to mention 5 and 3 being the only hand that made it ott and the maniac could possibly have it. Turns out our straight forward regular had it. What a surprise...

Yes. I counted for 12 outs (30% Equity) but in fact I had only 23% because of villain blocking my outs. I cannot expect villain to have both flushdraw removals on average but to call 70 in a pot with 230 I need 30% Equity. But I expect him to shove AT+flushdraw and sets aswell (20%: (TT,44,AT:hh,AT:cc,53)) which would give me 55% Hand-vs-Range Equity so I guess it´s pretty much a cooler. But this hand also shows on one hand the power of the nutflushdraw and on the other hand what a huge impact side-cards can make in terms of Equity-denial.


Reply
Quote