Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/pfr/af/wts/ats/foldbb/w$sd;CO$57.09:///////;Hero$91.98:///////;[/tg]
0.25/0.50 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.8 by www.pokerstrategy.cc.
Preflop: Hero is BB with K♠, A♠
MP3 folds, CO raises to $1.00, 2 folds, Hero raises to $3.00, CO calls $2.00.
Flop: ($6.25) 9♠, K♣, 3♥ (2 players)
Hero bets $4, CO calls $4.00.
Turn: ($14.25) 4♣ (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $5.50, Hero calls $5.50.
River: ($25.25) 8♥ (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $7, Hero calls $7.00.
Final Pot: $39.25
Is checking the turn the best method of pot control? Should I have 'reraised for information' at any point or just let him fill the pot and fold to a sufficiently large value bet?
Furthurmore, if I have the ability to identify and exploit fish at a limit, but also to recognise when someones better than me and leave in such a case, have I beaten the limit? (i.e. I can readily make money at this limit but have only been doing so by seeking out fish).
Also, I'm only comfortable playing with 1 stack at a table - after winning an additional stack I usually scarper. Is this advisable until having played a lot more? (Because it is usually only the stronger players than will have large numbers of chips, having won them, and hence if you are going to avoid them you wont need much more than 1 stack).