Live Action versus Replayer Videos
When I first started playing poker, I remember how revolutionary the idea of watching videos of great players playing at their computer and discussing their thought process. To me, it was the perfect learning supplement to the stuff I would read on the forums. All the videos were Live Action videos - a player would sit down, turn on Camtasia, and talk for 50 minutes while playing.
Taylor Caby, the founder of CardRunners, was notorious for his lengthy explanations during which he would have to hit the timer to get all his thoughts in. I remember one specific hand at 5/10 where he had the nuts and was involved in a $2,000+ pot where he kept talking and talking and finally the timer ran out and he folded. He was really tilted because of this.
I was a member of multiple training sites - trying to sink in as much as possible. I remember watching a video by BobboFittos on LeggoPoker which was the first replayer format video. Bobbo recorded a session earlier and then went back and discussed the action using pauses and rewinding. Now it seems like close to 100% of videos are replayer videos. They tend to be much smoother.
In terms of your own growth as a player, I believe that making a video and then watching it either with a friend or by yourself is a great learning experience. Two things are likely to happen:
1. If you try to explain your decisions while you play you will realize that it's difficult if you play a few tables and nearly impossible if you play your normal number of tables.
2. When you go back and watch the video, you are likely to be surprised you played some hands the way you did. I'm not talking about hands that you clearly thought you misplayed in the moment you played them. I'm talking about hands that you forgot and then seeing them on video will genuinely surprise you. You will say "That's not a play I usually make." Guess what - it probably is.
I think everyone would benefit from making a short 25 minute video of their play and then going back and reflecting on it. Socrates said "An unexamined life is not worth living." Watching yourself play is an eye-opening experience. I honestly think that some players wouldn't want to do it because of the sheer fear of what they will see. Their egos will not allow them to face reality. That's a whole other discussion though. For now, if you decide to do it, here are some things to pay attention to:
1. How quickly do you make decisions? Are you giving off any timing tells?
Spoiler
Yes, you are.
2. Is there anything that surprised you about your play? What was it and why did it surprise you?
3. What were your most difficult decisions in that session? Are those normally areas that you have trouble with? Why do you think you have trouble there?
I want to return to the discussion about live action vs. replayer videos in a later post. For now, we agree that poker is about decision making, right? It started with me noticing that most people are able to come up with the right action to a given hand that they see in the forums, but then they make lots of fundamental mistakes when they are actually playing at the tables. This was surprising at first.
It made me wonder - why is it that all these people are experts in the forums but losing or break-even players at the tables? This question was a turning point for me in my pursuit to understand why some people are long-term winners and others are not. It once again highlighted a key area of poker which makes it different from other intellectual pursuits like solving a math problem or puzzle.