I may be very interested in being the "guinea pig"
There is not much to say about your month Tim, it's fking awesome, still. I remember you saying that you are nearing the maximum $/hour possible when you had 30 per hour
Well played!
Can you talk a little bit more about whether the new monitor was worth it? I'm thinking about buying one as well, so if you could say a few sentences about how it helped you would be great.
Also, is that monitor 1920*1080 resolution?
As for the multitabling I'd suggest going over your maximum. I mean, in my small experience, stretching over your multitabling skills can make you improve faster, even if it may cost you a few bucks. You could even think about moving down to the $7 limit. So I'd suggest playing 12 tables.
That's what I did back when I wanted to increase my tables. It looked like a huge mess during my 12-tabling sessions but afterwards I had no problems whatsoever with 9-10 tables.
I'm also interested in the monitors resolution. I tried to find something with more than 1920x1080 a while ago but everything was very expensive.
Originally posted by akrammon
There is not much to say about your month Tim, it's fking awesome, still. I remember you saying that you are nearing the maximum $/hour possible when you had 30 per hour![]()
Well played!
Can you talk a little bit more about whether the new monitor was worth it? I'm thinking about buying one as well, so if you could say a few sentences about how it helped you would be great.
Also, is that monitor 1920*1080 resolution?As for the multitabling I'd suggest going over your maximum. I mean, in my small experience, stretching over your multitabling skills can make you improve faster, even if it may cost you a few bucks. You could even think about moving down to the $7 limit. So I'd suggest playing 12 tables.
That's what I did back when I wanted to increase my tables. It looked like a huge mess during my 12-tabling sessions but afterwards I had no problems whatsoever with 9-10 tables.
Thanks, akra
Well, to clarify ,I bought one of these monitors a while back. It made a huge difference compared to two *17" monitors. Then i put back in one of the 17" monitors (on the side) for the lobbies and i/net. Then most recently I brought a duplicate 28" monitor so as to be able to get 9-12 tables and lobbies without having the tables too small. So I would say the biggest benefit was the first 28" monitor and this recent acquistion was helpful but not absolutely essential.
But I have noticed this, as a generalisation, about reinvesting profits in poker: the lower one's hourly, the harder it is - psycologically - to justify using a chunk of your profits to buy new hardware/software. But perversly, reinvesting profits is often the most effective way of increasing your hourly. Whenever you buy new software/bigger screen/take coaching or play higher limits you are reinvesting profit in order to make the next bit of profit even more quickly. Finding the balance is hard, but delaying 'until one has a bigger BR' as I have often done in the past, can be counterproductive.
The res is my monitors is 1920 x 1200. As I understand it there is a big price jump if you want a higher screen resolution than this. I.e. significantly more than 2 * 28" monitors.
Originally posted by EmanuelC16
Isn't that resolution kind of low for that screen size?
It's not one of those IPS pro monitors with 2500+ res.
1920x1200 is still a bit better than ordinary FullHD monitors (1920x1080). For example this would mean a difference between some overlapping and no overlapping of 9 tables at Ongame.
As for poker, even 3 Samsungs with 1920x1080 would cost less than 1 monitor with 2500+.
Well, I only use one 23" Samsung and it feels having the same resolution on 28" isn't that great...
For all the fanboys out there (I know I am). Tim now also offers Private coachings!
I use a 40'' 1920 x 1080 lcd tv as monitor and it's working great for me. Takes some time getting used to when switching from a smaller pc monitor of course. Bought mine on a christmas sale for $450.
Solid month as usual, Tim!
+1 for increasing volume, I will try to work on that this month too.
Very pleased to announce that my private coaching thread is now up: Private Coaching
I'm very keen to get going with a core of students, so I've deliberately set prices on the low side to help drum up interest. They should offer very good value for money in today's market. If you want something that's not mentioned or you have a specific proposal in mind, please don't be afraid to ask.
P.s. (Many thanks to Melvin for getting me going on all this, and for the bump just now).
Tim: Thanks for the long line of thoughts about the screens. I'm definitely going to invest into a new screen.
Gratz on the private coaching, it really looks like great value!
edit: p.s. might wanna add it to your signature
Runbad continues. So far this month, EV 12.2%; real 1.1%. But what's $1k between friends?
Sick calldown today on $200.00
Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $50(BB) Replayer
Hero ($845)
BB ($723)
UTG ($1,825)
UTG+1 ($2,120)
CO ($1,747)
BTN ($1,740)
Dealt to Hero J♠ 2♠
fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls $25, BB checks
FLOP ($100) K♠ 2♣ 4♦
Hero bets $50, BB calls $50
TURN ($200) K♠ 2♣ 4♦ 9♣
Hero checks, BB bets $50, Hero calls $50
RIVER ($300) K♠ 2♣ 4♦ 9♣ K♦
Hero checks, BB bets $573 (AI), Hero calls $573
Hero shows J♠ 2♠
(Pre 57%, Flop 63.1%, Turn 77.3%)
BB shows 5♣ 6♠
(Pre 43%, Flop 36.9%, Turn 22.7%)
Hero wins $1,446
On the plus side, I've really enjoyed my few coaching sessions so far. All students show definite promise. Another tomorrow afternoon, finishing just in time to watch Murray pwn Federer.
Originally posted by Tim64
Ru Another tomorrow afternoon, finishing just in time to watch Murray pwn Federer.![]()
wghehehehehe I didnt catch that last part of yer sentence, mate
Originally posted by dydukas
1920x1200 is still a bit better than ordinary FullHD monitors (1920x1080). For example this would mean a difference between some overlapping and no overlapping of 9 tables at Ongame.As for poker, even 3 Samsungs with 1920x1080 would cost less than 1 monitor with 2500+.
Do you know any good 27''+ 1920x1080 monitor?
Murray lost, obv. When he won the first set I was like this:
When he lost the next three, I was like this:
Today's coaching was excellent, though. My students are the nutz!
Originally posted by herekPL
Originally posted by dydukas
1920x1200 is still a bit better than ordinary FullHD monitors (1920x1080). For example this would mean a difference between some overlapping and no overlapping of 9 tables at Ongame.As for poker, even 3 Samsungs with 1920x1080 would cost less than 1 monitor with 2500+.
Do you know any good 27''+ 1920x1080 monitor?
Well I like my Hanns.G, but it's 28". However, I find that extra inch a great source of satisfation.
Originally posted by bjela
That's what she said?
Yeah. Which was weird cos I didn't realise Mrs Tim64 cared so much about my system setup.
Originally posted by Tim64
Murray lost, obv.
Disappointed for him. Federer played 2 serious points in the 12th game of the second set and just mauled him thereafter. If Murray held his serve in that game and won the tie-break I think he would have won it in three sets.
Can't say I watch much Tennis or anything of the sort but I've always had a love for the green grass of Wimbledon

