Originally posted by tonypmm
Regarding an earlier talk about learning to play vs regs:
Spoiler
Originally posted by IvicaIliev77
Originally posted by krugger3000
Very nice to hear
I think that too much spins regs focus only on game vs fish but being able to have decent winrate vs reg is very important at higher stakes I guess. On lower stakes I encounter a ton of "regfish" ; people having very
decent winrate, probably beatin 90% of the field easily but not able to win anything vs me because of very exploitable strategy and not much adaptation. They seem not to understand that you found a leak and are over exploiting them in some spots.
I wish you the best and hope not to find you at my tables !!
I agree with you.
Until you reach 30s on Stars or even 60s, it becomes less important to focus on reg vs reg play because you have high % of recreational players per game on average. On other networks however that is not the case. Even from lower limits there are regs who are post RB winning or be or crushing, so mix of them + you get to play a lot more games vs 2 regs. This is why it becomes very important not only to understand how they play or what game plan they have but rather to learn to interpret stats and readjust accordingly. So that is something I am working now on and towards - covering my own game plan leaks and deviating my strategy based on opponents leaks.
The remarkable thing about Stars is not only that there are fewer regs per table, but also that, at the low stakes, the player pools are big and certain regs run into you less often, thus you don't lose too many chips to exploitation by a reg who knows you well because regs generally won't have a sufficient sample on you unless they're high-volume, but even then, they usually don't have enough time to check advanced HUD stats on you. Therefore, exploitable play aimed at getting the most value from recs is actually quasi-optimal.
So where to play is a matter of taste - those who're good at exploiting the concrete dynamics vs a handful of certain regs are better off playing in a small pool where screen names are permanent, whereas those who're good at robotic grind vs general population tendencies are better off in a big pool or one where names are changed frequently (such as Microgaming) and shouldn't really be upset about getting exploited once in a while.
But either way, I feel that database analysis (of either the most frequent opponents or the whole population) in search of the easiest exploits by the 80/20 rule gives much faster improvement at stakes <$25 where hardly anyone plays GTO anyway than the use of GTO tools.
I don't see the need to do things aimed at beating $25s+ (such as watching Doug Polk) until one actually gets there, because it's necessary to beat the rake at the low stakes to get the bankroll for high ones, and the rake can be beat merely by a narrow margin if playing GTO, it seems.
Tony with close to 90% of your post I agree 100% however, the last part(s) I don't agree with. I will do my best in short time to elaborate what I mean.
Use of GTO tools - to do it or not to do it
Several years ago, GTO solutions didn't exist. That pretty much meant that people were doing things either by 1) random guesses how something should be played IP and OOP 2) or by doing DB analysis and then using cREV and such software
That lead to tons of coaching videos, sites and simply BAD ADVICE that coaches give. Do this because I say it works so and so, or I have such and such win rate. The big problem with both of approaches that I mentioned here is: 1) Doing things random, subjective feeling applying to strategy things can only work so far and its a hit and miss + if you are not theoretically strong, your subjective feeling might be right (gut feeling of what opponents do) but you still don't have numbers part down how to exploit them properly to maximize EV 2) doing db analysis is great HOWEVER GAMES CHANGE, tendencies change and what worked 2-3 years ago, today are different standards and tomorrow and 4 years from now there will be different standard in play. This is why 1 DB analysis can give you great success and increase your EV but in reality solid regs can re-adjust their game plan and then you are screwed because they outsmarted you. In future, more and more games will be tougher and people will be less exploitable - thanks to GTO solver software.
Now I get to WHY its important to LEARN and PRACTICE with GTO solvers.
Number 1 reason is - YOU GET A GREAT STARTING STRATEGY! If you start with GTO strategy and learn what you should do IP and OOP as GTO, then you understand by doing DB analysis for both regs and recreational players what they are doing different from GTO. And now, having this information, you can always deviate from GTO and adjust it to exploit super specific leak or stat from reg or fish based on the reads/hands/sample/stats/exploit. BUT, if you play new regs, don't have hands on them, or simply play unknown opponents, GTO is the way to GO because it covers your LEAKS which is very important (opponents cant exploit you) and then you can deviate based on their plans.
I did work and still do in PIO Solver. Its my go to study tool. I will not go into specific ways how but I am sure you get what I mean when I say that having starting GTO base strategy (especially vs solid REGS) is the way to go - because they are the ones that then show you their own leaks vs your GTO and then you can tweak it to increase your EV further vs them.
Finally, in regards to "no need to learn from Polk until at such and such stake", again, I refer you to what I said now. Polk talks about balanced strategy and also discuss exploits. Doug talks in depth range vs range, specific hand selection, bet sizings, different run outs and vs specific opponents how to adjust. Simply put, Doug Polk is as close as it comes to FREE COACHING for GTO and Exploitative APPROACH how to play a hand as well as whole range. And that right there is PRICELESS. I would pay thousands of $ for such information and Doug decided to share it with the world on his YouTube channel.
It shocks me to a very high degree that a lot of regs in all game areas still think GTO is "shit" "garbage" "useless" "not applicable to their limit or opponents" when they all along have no clue what the whole point of GTO is. The way I treat GTO is to learn super solid STARTING strategy vs VERY GOOD PLAYERS. Then I can analyze, study that strategy and understand why EVERY SINGLE HAND is played the way it is played pre flop. Now when I play recreational player or reg with such and such stats, I can take GTO strategy and thanks to work with it understand how to ADAPT that strategy with exact EV results and not by feeling/gut or subjective opinion.
I am on the road to perfecting this and of course by the time I reach end of my journey I am sure I will not perfect this ever 100% but my goal is to stay ahead of the curve (whole field + individual regs that crush but I don't want them to win anything vs me) and to print money thanks to this approach which will bring me multiple game plans and to always be ready to maximize EV with sufficient prof (hands/sample/notes/showdowns/dynamics and other factors) while still focusing on playing very solid balanced poker, protecting my ranges both pre and post flop so that no opponent can rape me and exploit. That is the point of learning, practicing and understanding GTO.