Tight range, 5bet shoving pre vs cold 4bet:
https://gg.gl/nbh80
Notifications
Clear all
This one is the example of players who learned to 3bet marginal hands, but didn't learn to fold it pre or at least postflop. Not really tight of him, dont you think:
https://gg.gl/d20e5
He didnt made a huge mistake pre or postflop, but again not a nitty range, but a range he must play the way he suppose to play:
https://gg.gl/j8qnm
See my cold 4bet pre takes the pot down, so there are 3-4bet wars between players to take the pot down pre:
https://gg.gl/yp7fr
See my 3bet flop, do you think he folded a tight range?? Off course not, he was bluffing using a pired board to do it:
https://gg.gl/vgkmj
@remember my post to you that you dont fold TP when you check the turn to a big bet river, see in this example why:
https://gg.gl/inimd
Imagine we dont have a set or not even AK as TP, we fold here a lot, buy they do bluff, my friends:
https://gg.gl/i8cpg
See his 5bet shove range pre, and I do understand it, it is not a huge mistake, but still check the ranges (not even gto)
https://gg.gl/kw5b8
Check the war of 3-4-5 bet ranges and folds to that: the villaind cold 4betted and folden to 5 bet shove:
heyy, another bluff catching: I do block KQ, I dont think he flats AK, so I only lose to KJ/KT or sets.
https://gg.gl/sw367
And another bluff, imagine I have small-meidum pairs or K high, then I have to fold it because it is a microstakes???
https://gg.gl/85rnd
Please experience the 3-4-5 bet war preflop and fold anyway, not really tight, dont you think??
https://gg.gl/dln4e
PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.02/$0.05 - 6 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit - https://pokeit.co/public/225h2gvtw/r
UTG: $5.49 (110 bb)
MP: $3.76 (75 bb)
CO (Hero): $5.00 (100 bb)
BU: $5.11 (102 bb)
SB: $5.17 (103 bb)
BB: $4.37 (87 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero is CO with 5♠ 5♣
2 players fold, Hero raises to $0.15, BTN 3-bets to $0.48, SB calls $0.46, BB 4-bets to $4.37 (all-in), CO (Hero) folds, 1 fold, SB calls $3.89
Flop: ($9.37) 8♥ 7♠ 9♠ (2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($9.37) 8♠ (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($9.37) 8♦ (2 players, 1 all-in)
Total pot: $9.37 (Rake: $0.39)
Showdown:
BB shows K♦ K♥ (a full house, Eights full of Kings)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 81%, Flop: 71%, Turn: 70%, River: 100%)
SB shows J♠ J♣ (a full house, Eights full of Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 19%, Flop: 29%, Turn: 30%, River: 0%)
BB wins $8.98
No 4bet jacks on SB but cold call and call 4bet all in BB (typical for AA/KK)
PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.02/$0.05 - 6 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit - https://pokeit.co/public/425h2gQBZ/r
UTG: $5.80 (116 bb)
MP: $6.94 (139 bb)
CO: $4.86 (97 bb)
BU: $7.96 (159 bb)
SB: $2.21 (44 bb)
BB (Hero): $5.00 (100 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero is BB with A♥ K♣
1 fold, MP calls $0.05, 1 fold, BTN raises to $0.20, 1 fold, Hero 3-bets to $0.75, 1 fold, BTN calls $0.55
Flop: ($1.57) Q♠ 9♠ T♦ (2 players)
Hero bets $0.50, BU folds
Total pot: $1.57 (Rake: $0.07)
BB (Hero) wins $1.50
pokerboy198229 see this very tight game?
I dont understand what do you have against nits. Especially if you play normal tables. Nits are among the easiest opponents to crush. Why do i need a proof that micros arent nitty.
NapoleonBonaparte135 for my opinion nit for example when I have on spot with QQ and postflop I have overpair two street value and I lose because opponent has KK (he no 3bet this preflop I put this hand before on this topic). And is very risky to 3bet/4bet bluff preflop vs this type players. My point is on regular tables nl5 PokerStars more players play passive premium hands preflop than aggresive bluffs.
Guys, I think you missed a good point. I you have for example fold to 3bet over 70% why another villain always should 3bet you with KK+ and get 3bb? He can take the risk by not 3bet you and trying to get more money post-flop. Instead of this, he can more often 3bet you with a bluff range like A2s-A5s, 65s-98s, etc. because of your imagination of the micro limits.
It's all about using the correct 3bet range strategy according to your opponent's fold to 3bet stat. For example, if your opponent folds too many to 3bet you should use a polarized 3bet range and if not then you should use merged 3bets consists only top range. But you know this is my opinion.
Originally posted by Gomez224
Guys, I think you missed a good point. I you have for example fold to 3bet over 70% why another villain always should 3bet you with KK+ and get 3bb? He can take the risk by not 3bet you and trying to get more money post-flop. Instead of this, he can more often 3bet you with a bluff range like A2s-A5s, 65s-98s, etc. because of your imagination of the micro limits.It's all about using the correct 3bet range strategy according to your opponent's fold to 3bet stat. For example, if your opponent folds too many to 3bet you should use a polarized 3bet range and if not then you should use merged 3bets consists only top range. But you know this is my opinion.
100% agree with you and Im trying to explain this two month long to some players here....Thats is what defintely happens in all games, it is more player depended than what stakes you play...