Originally posted by nidorino
I think actually its a fold from sb but a call from bb in high rake environment. Def not a 3b in bb which is qiute common.
It could be a raise or a call if the BU is a fit and folder or overplay postflop and/or if BB is bad and we have good implied if when hit.
Not sure what hand this was referring to.
Some interesting spots from today:
Finnish (based on name) reggy player getting punished for loosey goosey 3bet. Checked in plo50 sim that QJ86ds would be lowest one of this type that would 3bet. Preflop 4bet is no brainer. Lot of players actually dont 4bet this and it creates very AA, AKK heavy 4bet range.
Flop was pretty interesting. So my assumption in game was that we have very high check frequency here as AA obviously hate to see this flop. Checked in trainer and its indeed 80% check. My specific hand though prefers to pot. But pretty happy with the play anyway versus aggro type opponent. Sets and straight check in trainer almost always. But two pair does pot lot more often but checks purely if having fd. Should also just x-r flop but anyway.
Game #2057270287: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 16:26:34 2024/03/13
Seated players
Seat 2: Samansu (€57.59)
Seat 3: KatujenKauhu (€50)
Seat 4: Omenino (€52.77)
Seat 5: RONALDO44 (€51.37)
Seat 6: Pasca_SOL (€72.02)
Blinds and button
Pasca_SOL has the button
Samansu posts small blind €0.25
KatujenKauhu posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu Q♦:J♠:A♠:8♦:
Preflop
Omenino folds
RONALDO44 folds
Pasca_SOL folds
Samansu raises €1.25 to €1.50
KatujenKauhu raises €4 to €4.50
Samansu raises €12 to €13.50
KatujenKauhu calls €9
Flop Q♥:9♥:8♣: (27€)
Samansu checks
KatujenKauhu bets €13.50
Samansu calls €13.50
Turn 4♦: (54€)
Samansu checks
KatujenKauhu bets €23, and is all-in
Samansu calls €23
Showdown
River 8♥:
Samansu shows Q♦:J♠:A♠:8♦:, Full House
KatujenKauhu shows 5♥:J♥:Q♠:3♠:, A Flush
Samansu wins €97
Summary
Total pot €100 Rake €3
Suuuuuuper weird s**t in this one... 
Game #2057145812: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 12:20:02 2024/03/13
Seated players
Seat 1: DOUBLEAGLE (€49.20)
Seat 2: Samansu (€50)
Seat 3: Fabs4 (€61.19)
Seat 5: KSW (€111.10)
Blinds and button
Fabs4 has the button
KSW posts small blind €0.25
DOUBLEAGLE posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu K♠:Q♣:A♥:J♦:
Preflop
Samansu raises €1.75 to €1.75
Fabs4 folds
KSW folds
DOUBLEAGLE calls €1.25
Flop 9♠:T♥:Q♥: (3.75€)
DOUBLEAGLE checks
Samansu bets €1.87
DOUBLEAGLE calls €1.87
Turn J♣: (7.49€)
DOUBLEAGLE checks
Samansu bets €7.49
DOUBLEAGLE calls €7.49
River J♠: (22.47€)
DOUBLEAGLE bets €11.23
Samansu raises €38.89 to €38.89, and is all-in
DOUBLEAGLE calls €26.86, and is all-in
Uncalled bet returned to Samansu: €0.80
Showdown
DOUBLEAGLE shows 8♣:4♣:9♥:K♦:, A Straight
Samansu shows K♠:Q♣:A♥:J♦:, Full House
Samansu wins €95.65
Summary
Total pot €98.65 Rake €3
Bit loose 3bet from my side. Postflop outcome was nice though. Dont really get opponent turn decision. But good example why these type of 3bets are not that great in real life. Its actually not 3bet in trainer either with ds version but only with ss combo. But anyway KKQxss is only solid call versus 3bet here as AKKQ or KKQQ. Combo like KKQJ is basically breakeven. Well gto wise. Could be better as pool obviously dont play optimal postflop but on other hand they also tend to have more AA.
Game #2057234012: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 15:26:09 2024/03/13
Seated players
Seat 1: Samansu (€97.70)
Seat 2: Larghetto (€52.81)
Seat 3: KSW (€113.23)
Seat 4: Inshallahsal (€46.82)
Seat 5: BANGBUS (€66.17)
Seat 6: KatujenKauhu (€50.75)
Blinds and button
Samansu has the button
Larghetto posts small blind €0.25
KSW posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu 7♠:6♠:7♣:A♣:
Preflop
Inshallahsal raises €1.75 to €1.75
BANGBUS folds
KatujenKauhu folds
Samansu raises €6 to €6
Larghetto folds
KSW folds
Inshallahsal calls €4.25
Flop 4♦:3♦:4♠: (12.75€)
Inshallahsal checks
Samansu bets €4
Inshallahsal calls €4
Turn 5♥: (20.75€)
Inshallahsal checks
Samansu bets €12.50
Inshallahsal raises €36.82 to €36.82, and is all-in
Samansu calls €24.32
Showdown
River A♠:
Samansu shows 7♠:6♠:7♣:A♣:, A Straight
Inshallahsal shows Q♣:2♥:K♥:K♠:, Two pairs, Kings up
Samansu wins €91.39
Summary
Total pot €94.39 Rake €3
This was interesting one. Was kind of trainer approved line though trainer would use 1/3 or pot sizings on river and this hand would fall into small sizing. Well I checked in slightly different board, 74364 one with AK22. Flop just x-f but when BU checks back he will actually cap his range quite a bit in general. Lot of two pair+ and one pair with straight draw are supposed to stab.
Game #2057142878: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 12:12:21 2024/03/13
Seated players
Seat 3: xHamster (€102.94)
Seat 4: Fabs4 (€36.23)
Seat 5: Samansu (€53.41)
Blinds and button
Fabs4 has the button
Samansu posts small blind €0.25
xHamster posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu 3♣:A♣:3♥:K♥:
Preflop
Fabs4 raises €1.75 to €1.75
Samansu raises €5.50 to €5.75
xHamster folds
Fabs4 calls €4
Flop 8♠:4♣:5♦: (12€)
Samansu checks
Fabs4 checks
Turn 6♣: (12€)
Samansu bets €6
Fabs4 calls €6
River 5♥: (24€)
Samansu bets €12
Fabs4 folds
Uncalled bet returned to Samansu: €12
Samansu wins €23.16
Summary
Total pot €24 Rake €0.84
So while I close to range check flop this would be strategy in trainer for BU:
So on turn I get good amount of equity and really dont want to x-f so wrnt for half pot. Range wise I probably also have polarity advantage if villain is not very passive on flop. On river sized small as I would want to value bet 8 high straight. Also I think boats are rare for both.
Played one session for today. Probably wont play another as nephew is visiting again. Anyway got some spots on the tables:
So great spot preflop to squeeze. Hoped for preflop take down after CO and BU folded but SB did call. Flop is bit bad in a way that SB range is usually very broadway heavy in this spot. This was also solid reggy player. But I think my hand is still mandatory bet with all cards having blocker value. I could see potentially this spot having some sense to use smaller sizing. But I think my hand type still prefer pot. But if I had like two bdfd smaller bet might be really good.
Turn is one of worst. Really hard to see what I could be beating here and I also have A♠: blocking most reasonable rare semibluff combos. But I kind of doubt if there are any anyway. So I folded despite good pot odds. I can see some two pairs that could lead shove turn but imo there are also bunch of AJ, J9 which we are almost dead against. Need close to 25% but I think I have like 20% at best.
Game #2058366051: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 13:07:05 2024/03/15
Seated players
Seat 1: zuzzoo (€300.73)
Seat 2: xHamster (€114.91)
Seat 3: Samansu (€128.62)
Seat 5: cainV (€100)
Seat 6: oidipus (€104.02)
Blinds and button
zuzzoo has the button
xHamster posts small blind €0.50
Samansu posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu A♦:K♦:9♦:A♠:
Preflop
cainV folds
oidipus raises €3.50 to €3.50
zuzzoo calls €3.50
xHamster calls €3
Samansu raises €16.50 to €17.50
oidipus folds
zuzzoo folds
xHamster calls €14
Flop K♣:6♠:Q♦: (42€)
xHamster checks
Samansu bets €42
xHamster calls €42
Turn T♠: (126€)
xHamster bets €55.41, and is all-in
Samansu folds
Uncalled bet returned to xHamster: €55.41
xHamster wins €123
Summary
Total pot €126 Rake €3
Bit later had this versus same villain. Probably not like mandatory 3bet but should be in gto ranges. Also I know this guy does fold decent amount to 3bets. Flop I think potting is reasonable with all the backdoors I have.
Game #2058366989: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 13:08:42 2024/03/15
Seated players
Seat 1: zuzzoo (€297.23)
Seat 2: xHamster (€178.41)
Seat 3: Samansu (€100)
Seat 5: cainV (€100.50)
Seat 6: oidipus (€100.52)
Blinds and button
Samansu has the button
cainV posts small blind €0.50
oidipus posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Samansu T♣:K♦:9♣:6♦:
Preflop
zuzzoo folds
xHamster raises €3.50 to €3.50
Samansu raises €12 to €12
cainV folds
oidipus folds
xHamster calls €8.50
Flop 4♦:5♣:Q♠: (25.5€)
xHamster checks
Samansu bets €25.50
xHamster folds
Uncalled bet returned to Samansu: €25.50
Samansu wins €23.97
Summary
Total pot €25.50 Rake €1.53
Preflop in trainer looks like this:
So KT95ds with 5 dangler would be fold. KT96ds would have around 0.5bb so big EV. Call would also be better than fold. KT97ds on other hand would be way way too good to not 3bet.
But I was more curious to check if flop is supported by trainer:
Hand category itself seems to prefer check or half pot. I filtered below air with two bdfd and no sd. There was actually way less potting for overall range (26%) that I was thinking of which is most likely because of low card connectivity and position. E.g. if I check flop like Q62r its 40% potting.
My exact hand was around 60/40 on half and full pot mix.
Well did go for one more session. Apparently I should turn this hand into bluff on turn. I were actually thinking of it in game but thought it has too much showdown value. River is meh. I think call is actually probably the worst option.
Game #2058499136: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 16:37:37 2024/03/15
Seated players
Seat 1: k_haukka (€96.78)
Seat 2: Taratsa (€50)
Seat 3: Thone3 (€50)
Seat 4: emyxinter (€398.28)
Seat 5: Snakeeyes110 (€50) (sitting out)
Seat 6: blrsgonnabal (€54.93)
Blinds and button
Taratsa has the button
Thone3 posts small blind €0.25
emyxinter posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 6♣:K♣:5♣:K♠:
Preflop
blrsgonnabal folds
k_haukka raises €1.75 to €1.75
Taratsa calls €1.75
Thone3 folds
emyxinter calls €1.25
Flop A♠:Q♠:K♥: (5.5€)
emyxinter checks
k_haukka bets €2.75
Taratsa calls €2.75
emyxinter folds
Turn 9♠: (11€)
k_haukka checks
Taratsa checks
River 8♠: (11€)
k_haukka bets €3.75
Taratsa calls €3.75
Showdown
k_haukka shows T♥:J♣:6♦:A♦:, A Straight
Taratsa shows 6♣:K♣:5♣:K♠:, Three of a kind, Kings
k_haukka wins €17.85
Summary
Total pot €18.50 Rake €0.65
"Turn is one of worst." . Yeah I think fold is a nice option and we simply move on to the next hand, we have big enough bankroll and we are well prepared to accept this type of losses.
"Apparently I should turn this hand into bluff on turn." straights, AA, weak flushes would fold?
Originally posted by taavi1337
"Apparently I should turn this hand into bluff on turn." straights, AA, weak flushes would fold?
Good question. Bit different flop but trainer would bet 3/4 pot with AdKK!dd combos basically always. CO would continue like this:
So straight fold half of the time. Top set never folds and flushes basically never fold. If we then go to blank river AdKK!dd always pot in my shoes. Opponent respond like this:
So straights and AA mainly fold. Basically only combos of these call sometimes if they have A♦: blocking nuts. Not so sure in reality if those calls make sense as I think people mainly bluff only with nut blocker. Flop is bit different with non diamond A. I think it actually make BU range to have more Ad!dd combos as we obviously continue bit more with Axxx combos than on my hand Kxxx combos.
So overall in trainer we push most AA and most straights out of the pot and 1/4 of the flushes. If we look on turn straights, AA and flushes make half of CO check range. I suppose one side of potting this kind of hand on turn in BU shoes is to also have some coverage on pairing rivers. So if I make river pair bottom card CO would bet 25% of time with pot size. I actually expected that to be higher. I think as exploit though CO could lead pot way more as in reality BU wont have boat 27% of time as trainer assume. I think flop structure is to also blame for kinda low river lead from CO here as BU wont raise much on flop like that (only 3.7% in trainer).
So we could bluff with lower part of our range there, and if we jam he might get afraid of flush and fold his non-flush holdings I understand... So which looks more like a flush, jamming (potting) the turn or the river? I think after we check the turn we don't seem to hold a flush. I think if he's not folding AA he is also not folding a str8 either.
Well we sure have flushes after checking but I think lot of players might think we dont. Even some nut flushes check gto wise but I think thats not necessarily good option in real life versus most. After checking turn having nut blocker is not that valuable anymore. I think versus river block bet though we can still raise some weaker flushes like J and T high ones.
Kind of good example of "gto mistake" not necessarily being mistake. So in this flop gto wise we have around 20% leads. Opponent should bet versus check 45% of time with 2/3 sizing. His specific hand would be check but if betting it should be fold versus x-shove. But if opponent both over cbet and overplay stuff we probably dont want to lead as much. Well I dont really have leading range here anyway as default.
Game #2058511890: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 17:00:17 2024/03/15
Seated players
Seat 1: k_haukka (€164.69)
Seat 2: Taratsa (€129.72)
Seat 5: Snakeeyes110 (€53.58)
Blinds and button
k_haukka has the button
Taratsa posts small blind €0.25
Snakeeyes110 posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 7♥:T♥:K♦:T♦:
Preflop
k_haukka folds
Taratsa raises €1.25 to €1.50
Snakeeyes110 raises €4 to €4.50
Taratsa calls €3
Flop T♣:5♦:9♣: (9€)
Taratsa checks
Snakeeyes110 bets €8
Taratsa raises €33 to €33
Snakeeyes110 raises €41.08 to €49.08, and is all-in
Taratsa calls €16.08
Showdown
Turn J♣:
River .3h:
Taratsa shows 7♥:T♥:K♦:T♦:, Three of a kind, Tens
Snakeeyes110 shows 6♣:A♠:A♦:9♦:, A Pair of Aces
Taratsa wins €105.66
Summary
Total pot €107.16 Rake €1.50
Got to love players like these. I mean bet in flop make sense but potting is just quite a overprotection. When I then raise versus pot bet his best case scenario is if I have like some top pair with nfd and three overcards to 6 or some combo draw. Versus all of those he will be behind in equity. Then versus set...
Game #2060685420: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 18:20:47 2024/03/18
Seated players
Seat 1: Inshallahsal (€100)
Seat 2: 684564 (€100)
Seat 3: nottilting (€165.67)
Seat 4: Taratsa (€117.86)
Seat 5: Nakedgun (€83.34)
Seat 6: JanLipavsky (€100) (sitting out)
Blinds and button
nottilting has the button
Taratsa posts small blind €0.50
Nakedgun posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 8♦:Q♦:J♦:J♠:
Preflop
Inshallahsal calls €1
684564 folds
nottilting folds
Taratsa calls €0.50
Nakedgun raises €3 to €4
Inshallahsal calls €3
Taratsa calls €3
Flop 6♣:J♣:5♥: (12€)
Taratsa checks
Nakedgun checks
Inshallahsal bets €12
Taratsa raises €48 to €48
Nakedgun folds
Inshallahsal raises €84 to €96, and is all-in
Taratsa calls €48
Showdown
Turn 7♣:
River 5♣:
Inshallahsal shows J♥:6♠:A♥:4♣:, Two pairs, Jacks up
Taratsa shows 8♦:Q♦:J♦:J♠:, Full House
Taratsa wins €201
Summary
Total pot €204 Rake €3
This was interesting imo from my side.
Game #2060675116: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 18:04:26 2024/03/18
Seated players
Seat 1: k_haukka (€56.22) (sitting out)
Seat 2: toughandrock (€38.62)
Seat 3: Adil8 (€72.77)
Seat 4: 684564 (€54.95)
Seat 5: PrintzulFcs (€50)
Seat 6: Taratsa (€53.83)
Blinds and button
PrintzulFcs has the button
Taratsa posts small blind €0.25
toughandrock posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 4♣:K♠:Q♣:Q♠:
Preflop
Adil8 raises €1.75 to €1.75
684564 folds
PrintzulFcs folds
Taratsa calls €1.50
toughandrock folds
Flop Q♥:T♥:7♦: (4€)
Taratsa bets €3
Adil8 raises €13 to €13
Taratsa raises €40 to €43
Adil8 raises €58.02 to €71.02, and is all-in
Taratsa calls €9.08, and is all-in
Uncalled bet returned to Adil8: €18.94
Showdown
Turn 7♠:
River J♥:
Adil8 shows 9♥:T♠:7♣:J♦:, Full House, Sevens full
Taratsa shows 4♣:K♠:Q♣:Q♠:, Full House, Queens full
Taratsa wins €105.16
Summary
Total pot €108.16 Rake €3
So preflop is actually breakeven in plo50 sim but versus recreational player we can definitely play this. Flop I was pretty sure I have quite hefty lead range and indeed it is:
WIth top set we are actually more aggro with kind of dry versions. Maybe its because of unblocking opponent continue range and opening possibility to 3bet flop and basically remove positional disadvantage.
Villain btw should not raise with JT97 even with fd.
So in this one I wasnt really sure about turn play. I think potting is fine with two fd. We can get some AA to fold and we dont mind to force some wraps or oesd type hands to fold either. Also maybe trainer uses bit smaller bet size in position here.
Preflop there is close to no 3betting with KKds without A I think.
Game #2061608220: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 13:03:54 2024/03/20
Seated players
Seat 1: xHamster (€199.18)
Seat 2: Kabytr (€99)
Seat 3: TopinTossut (€118.86)
Seat 4: LuckySword (€282.33)
Seat 5: Taratsa (€100)
Seat 6: Tuvvis (€125.66)
Blinds and button
xHamster has the button
Kabytr posts small blind €0.50
TopinTossut posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 5♣:K♣:K♠:6♠:
Preflop
LuckySword raises €3.50 to €3.50
Taratsa calls €3.50
Tuvvis calls €3.50
xHamster folds
Kabytr folds
TopinTossut folds
Flop 5♠:Q♠:J♣:
LuckySword bets €9
Taratsa calls €9
Tuvvis folds
Turn 7♣:
LuckySword checks
Taratsa bets €30
LuckySword raises €120 to €120
Taratsa calls €57.50, and is all-in
Uncalled bet returned to LuckySword: €32.50
Showdown
River 3♣:
LuckySword shows Q♥:A♣:J♠:T♠:, Two pairs, Queens up
Taratsa shows 5♣:K♣:K♠:6♠:, A Flush
Taratsa wins €202
Summary
Total pot €205 Rake €3
So preflop assumption was pretty much spot on it seems. Exactly one combo trainer would 3bet ♦
Seems like postflop was well played by both.
Ended second session from today early. Was not that much action and three tables were pretty bad ones. So I thought whats the point to continue really?
Kind of accidental correct sizing on turn in this one. So preflop is always call. Well I suppose 3bet can be fine with read EP is opening way too wide but only 3betting versus total maniac pretty much.
Flop we can lead or x-r. This combo even without bdfd would be strong enough to 3bet. In turn I thought small bet could make sense as I can leverage whole stack with it anyway by the river. Villain went for shove that he pretty much should never do with 2nd nut straight. Only with set that would be reasonable.
Well if I analyze villain play. I think he should just open fold that combo pre without K high suit. Flop cbet is probably ok but should fold to x-r. Plus just call turn. Now checking trainer output: Pre open with KT97 with K high suit is only +0.01 EV so questionable as well. Flop should be actually check. Well to be honest I actually missed he had double gs. If betting its gto wise call but most players will have stronger x-r range (me included) than trainer has.
Game #2061600979: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 12:43:22 2024/03/20
Seated players
Seat 1: FlushyFish (€50.25)
Seat 2: xHamster (€50)
Seat 3: MrButtMonkey (€51.39)
Seat 4: mm_64_pl (€23.40)
Seat 5: stinky89 (€27.13)
Seat 6: Taratsa (€50)
Blinds and button
mm_64_pl has the button
stinky89 posts small blind €0.25
Taratsa posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa J♣:Q♠:T♣:K♥:
Preflop
FlushyFish raises €1.75 to €1.75
xHamster folds
MrButtMonkey folds
mm_64_pl folds
stinky89 folds
Taratsa calls €1.25
Flop 5♥:J♠:9♣: (3.75€)
Taratsa checks
FlushyFish bets €2.81
Taratsa raises €9.83 to €9.83
FlushyFish calls €7.02
Turn 8♦: (23.41€)
Taratsa bets €7.50
FlushyFish raises €38.67 to €38.67, and is all-in
Taratsa calls €30.92, and is all-in
Uncalled bet returned to FlushyFish: €0.25
Showdown
River A♣:
FlushyFish shows K♣:7♦:9♠:T♦:, A Straight, Jack high
Taratsa shows J♣:Q♠:T♣:K♥:, A Straight, Queen high
Taratsa wins €97.25
Summary
Total pot €100.25 Rake €3
Kinda lucky in this hand. Pre is standard. We actually 3bet basically all double pair ds combo. Flop was bad and plan was to just fold to bet but I actually get free turn and hit bottom set. Also flush complete so just calling versus small bet and hoping to see check on non paired river.
Game #2061677538: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 15:53:48 2024/03/20
Seated players
Seat 1: LastVirgin (€105)
Seat 2: xHamster (€210.16)
Seat 3: PillisenKari (€108.60)
Seat 4: Taratsa (€119.74)
Seat 5: TheYoungCnt (€0) (sitting out)
Seat 6: 0nni (€138.74)
Blinds and button
xHamster has the button
PillisenKari posts small blind €0.50
Taratsa posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa 2♠:K♣:2♣:K♠:
Preflop
0nni folds
LastVirgin folds
xHamster folds
PillisenKari raises €2.50 to €3
Taratsa raises €8 to €9
PillisenKari raises €24 to €27
Taratsa calls €18
Flop T♦:6♣:Q♦: (54€)
PillisenKari checks
Taratsa checks
Turn 2♦: (54€)
PillisenKari bets €13.50
Taratsa calls €13.50
River 8♣: (81€)
PillisenKari checks
Taratsa checks
Showdown
PillisenKari shows A♠:A♥:K♥:4♦:, A Pair of Aces
Taratsa shows 2♠:K♣:2♣:K♠:, Three of a kind, Deuces
Taratsa wins €78
Summary
Total pot €81 Rake €3
Villain shows up with AAK4. I would think AA with nut gs and one flush blocker should just pot flop with SPR 1.5. We are bit deeper here compared to 100bb but I dont think it matter much:
So I filtered here AA without fd, bdfd, oesd, wrap or board pair blocker. We can see that most of those are still potting. If I also include K only combo that is lookind to check would be AAAK with no diamond and seems like those are still going for x-r versus pot bet. So I were lucky to hit that 2 but also got chance to realize my equity that should not really have happened.
Some other spots I took image or wasnt sure of:
I folded this pre having two upper gap and trip suit. Might be tight but I think some of these we are folding. Maybe connectivity is still too good though.
Indeed trainer wise this is call and quite reasonably better than fold. KT96sss would be fold.
In this I went for half pot stab with idea to fold to raise. Seems kind of reasonable with 8 and 6♣: but do we fold too much equity having bdfd?
Bit different flop. I changed my hand into QJ87 to make it similar to mine. This combo without bdfd and one fd blocker was stabbing almost pure. With bdfd it was stabbing 2/3 of time and if facing x-r its just too weak to continue.
Another perhaps bit loosey goosey flop stab. I think this is just call pre versus squeeze and we would want to have more connected one to 4bet but not sure.
Anyway on flop my plan was to stack off versus one.
Game #2061604877: Table €100 PL - 0.50/1.00 - Pot Limit Omaha - 12:53:46 2024/03/20
Seated players
Seat 1: FlushyFish (€190.60)
Seat 2: YlvaJunior (€184.91)
Seat 4: Taratsa (€100)
Blinds and button
Taratsa has the button
FlushyFish posts small blind €0.50
YlvaJunior posts big blind €1
Hole cards
Dealt to Taratsa T♣:8♥:K♣:6♥:
Preflop
Taratsa raises €3.50 to €3.50
FlushyFish calls €3
YlvaJunior raises €13 to €14
Taratsa calls €10.50
FlushyFish calls €10.50
Flop 8♣:9♥:J♠: (42€)
FlushyFish checks
YlvaJunior checks
Taratsa bets €15
FlushyFish folds
YlvaJunior folds
Uncalled bet returned to Taratsa: €15
Taratsa wins €40.50
Summary
Total pot €42 Rake €1.50
Seems to be call but kinda marginal. BB range might be tighter but SB range is usually way wider which helps. Hands like JT86ds or QT86ds would actually 4bet in trainer. Probably also nice to not have K to block hands like AKK which should mainly fold to 4bet.
Then the flop. Interesting fact but SB is supposed to lead 1/3 pot 55% of time. Well make sense concidering how tight and broadway heavy SB range is theory wise. BB is supposed to almost range check. I am supposed to 1/3 pot 33% of time. Seems like my combo is bit too loose to bet. Would then be bit too weak to stack off versus SB but clearly good enough versus BB. I think what often happen here is that SB lead way less and BB cbet more than compared to trainer. On other hand SB range being wider will also likely mean he has overall less good stuff. It seems like KJT6ds with two bdfd is stabbing like 50/50. So I were probably bit too wide in this one.
