Skip to forum
Patternised Number ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Patternised Number Generator and housebot proofing blog

516 Posts
51 Users
8 Reactions
97.6 K Views

Good to see you are getting somewhere in the 18mans, graph is looking sexy

Yeah some guys at 2+2 are insane, playing big volume for a week is already hard but playing 800 a day for a month is f***ing mental.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Thanks man, you're playing some pretty sick volume yourself, sir.


Reply
Quote
MilanBurdych
Joined: 20.05.2008
Poker Player

Originally posted by dangermowse
Well, Milan, of course there are so many shoves that are +ev, but definitely not +mev (maximum ev). With such a healthy stack you can't be taking those risks imo. When the whole table has folded then the chances BB holds the best hand that was dealt is pretty damn high, hence so many bvb stand offs. In his shoes I'd just complete/fold-stab.

Definitely agree it is not max EV, wouldnt shove it either, just wanted to say, it s not the worst play.

Did you somewhere in this blog stated your nickname on PS or u have reasons not to? ;)


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

It's not stated anywhere no ;)


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

What happens after you have a good day? Think it's pretty obvious don't you? The signs were there instantly with these two...

Poker Stars, $6.42 Buy-in (10/20 blinds) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players

MP3: 1,280 (64 bb)
CO: 1,490 (74.5 bb)
BTN: 1,920 (96 bb)
SB: 1,380 (69 bb)
BB: 1,500 (75 bb)
UTG+1: 1,500 (75 bb)
UTG+2: 1,500 (75 bb)
Hero (MP1): 1,500 (75 bb)
MP2: 1,430 (71.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 3♠ 4♠
2 folds, Hero raises to 60, MP2 calls 60, MP3 calls 60, CO calls 60, 3 folds

Flop: (270) 5♦ 2♦ A♣ (4 players)
Hero bets 180, MP2 folds, MP3 calls 180, CO folds

Turn: (630) 7♠ (2 players)
Hero bets 399, MP3 raises to 900, Hero raises to 1,260 and is all-in, MP3 calls 140 and is all-in

River: (2,710) 4♦ (2 players, 2 are all-in)

Results: 2,710 pot
Final Board: 5♦ 2♦ A♣ 7♠ 4♦
MP3 showed 2♠ 2♥ and lost (-1,280 net)
Hero showed 3♠ 4♠ and won 2,710 (1,430 net)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Poker Stars, $13.78 Buy-in (10/20 blinds) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players

MP1: 1,480 (74 bb)
MP2: 1,490 (74.5 bb)
MP3: 1,520 (76 bb)
CO: 1,460 (73 bb)
BTN: 1,470 (73.5 bb)
Hero (SB): 1,420 (71 bb)
BB: 1,540 (77 bb)
UTG+1: 1,590 (79.5 bb)
UTG+2: 1,530 (76.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 4♥ 2♥
5 folds, CO calls 20, BTN folds, Hero completes, BB checks

Flop: (60) 3♦ A♣ 8♠ (3 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, CO checks

Turn: (60) 5♠ (3 players)
Hero bets 60, BB folds, CO raises to 240, Hero raises to 1,400 and is all-in, CO calls 1,160

River: (2,860) 7♠ (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results: 2,860 pot
Final Board: 3♦ A♣ 8♠ 5♠ 7♠
CO showed 3♠ 3♣ and lost (-1,420 net)
Hero showed 4♥ 2♥ and won 2,860 (1,440 net)
BB mucked and lost (-20 net)

Wait a minute, TWO almost simultaneously made wheels hold up vs sets that miss their boats? What's so bad about that? Well, dear reader. In the usual pokerstars pattern it is 100% a VERY bad sign. Starting off this well is not something you want to see happen, because it means a bad session is on it's way. Indeed things went horribly all day thereafter (well only 70 games) to record a t100k negative chip ev difference despite winning $150 overall.

Today I included $30-18s in the mix and it was thanks to doing OKAY in those that enabled me to win a few bux. What I found playing in them was very simlar to what I found when playing the mid stakes 9-mans many moons ago in around 2009. And that was; yes, there are more and slightly better regs in the games, but the fish are actually worse than the $15's. I always believed this to be the case and still do today, the fish in higher stakes games are often ABSOLUTELY ATROCIOUS compared to lower stakes fish. This is why you'll often find regs ROI's over decent samples can be higher in the mid stakes than the low stakes. I always found this to be true of the old FTP 9-mans. Nearly every reg's $30 ROI was better than their $20, mine included. Very odd.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

I'm very annoyed with myself right now. After having possibly the best week the year, I just realised I forgot to play my last 20 games for a damn good shot at getting 1st in Neptune BOP! FMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFMLFML :facepalm: :rage:

edit: Can't believe they made FU man into a smilie that's awesome


Reply
Quote

Lol at signs on pokerstars :rolleyes:

And missing the BOP because you forgot to play the last couple of games is definitely FML big time.

Btw, why were you playing a $6.5 SNG?


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Probably a 45-man, $7


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

So I'm even more pissed about the BOP cock-up today. The 20 or so games I forgot to play at the $30 level I have now played and would have made a score that beat first place X( Basically over 113 of them I've run at 68% ROI LULZZZZ!! So that's $900 for 1st place I've missed out on. Really wanna smash my own face in for it.

But anyway I musn't be greedy as I think this is the best run good I've had over my entire poker career. Graph since I last posted one.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

It's been over a month since I last posted. These last couple of months of the year have been pretty exceptional for me, I think mostly in terms of run-better (I still refuse to accept it as run-good lol), but also I do feel my skills have improved a slight amount which has helped in not only maximising any run-half decent but also in minimising losses during run-not so decent!

Graph since last posted:

[edited by Thazar]


Reply
Quote
thazar
Joined: 14.09.2009
Elite Grinder

Hi dangermowse

sweet graph, congrats

I have edited your last post. Advertising / promoting or offering coaching on our boards is only allowed to PokerStrategy.com coaches

I trust you understand

Best regards

Thazar


Reply
Quote

Nice graph mate!
Btw are u SN at stars?

I haven't decided yet on moving to Stars, another thing I also thought of, is that Denmark is going to regulate poker in 2012, and Ongame is going to apply for a license, and I don't think/not sure if stars is going to apply for one. A big issue because I'll be in Denmark for at least 3/4 of 2012.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

No not a SN.

OMG Denmark are going to regulate aswell?!?!? Wtf! Will you be restricted to just Danish players? Surely not!

Wait I found this: Namely "Danish poker players can expect most networks to open “dot.dk” poker rooms, including PokerStars, PartyPoker, 888 and skins on Ongame and iPoker. The player pool is not expected to be segregated, rather shared with international player pools."

So that's ok. Then why can't the other fucking countries do the same?!??!?!??!?

http://pokerfuse.com/news/law-legislation/danes-are-set-spaniards-stall/


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

While I'm not playing due to being in a massive huff about the fact that what I aniticpated would happen has happened to the precise degree I thought it would, I'll do a little update.

December finished thus:

So another decent month making my final quarter of the year probably my best ever.

However, my prediction was that the new year would bring a flicked doomswitch and that is exactly what has happened. We're now back to running into AA a million times a day. I just had my worst EVER losing session, which was always bound to happen sooner or later since I've upped to $30 games. But it was still bad in terms of average buy-ins, over 30.
It was from 37 games during which according to my database I shoved into AA 14 times. Real sickening.

All the regs are out in full force straight away battling for sharkscope top spots. So when you are doing the same thing it's crucial to at least run halfway to expectation but it never ever happens in January. Guess I'll just have to be patient.


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by dangermowse
No not a SN.

OMG Denmark are going to regulate aswell?!?!? Wtf! Will you be restricted to just Danish players? Surely not!

Wait I found this: Namely "Danish poker players can expect most networks to open “dot.dk” poker rooms, including PokerStars, PartyPoker, 888 and skins on Ongame and iPoker. The player pool is not expected to be segregated, rather shared with international player pools."

So that's ok. Then why can't the other fucking countries do the same?!??!?!??!?

http://pokerfuse.com/news/law-legislation/danes-are-set-spaniards-stall/

Yeah fortunately Denmark is too small for a construction like Spain and France.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Well yeh but I still don't get why they can't keep their players mixing with others, what difference does it make as long as they're getting their licence and tax money?!? The bastards make me seethe!!


Reply
Quote
MilanBurdych
Joined: 20.05.2008
Poker Player

Nice month and I finally figured out (accidentally) what your screen name is :) GL in 2012!


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Anyone can havve my SN if they want coaching :)


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Had a better day today.


Reply
Quote
dangermowse Topic starter
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Today (sunday) I have fired up a few leisurely MTT's; mainly from boredom but not really wanting to grind properly. Included in the 9 total games played was a $25 6-max hyper with 1100+ entrants. I ran pretty well in it to be fair, as you would expect to have to in a hyper!! Anyways I managed to make it all the way to the FT!! 6th went out and there I was in 5th with about 4bbs. Button on 20+bbs raises and I'm in the SB as easily the shortest by a country mile; with A6o. Easily ahead of his range but with no FE so decide on a stop n go.
It probaby would have worked had he not binked top pair with Q9o!! :( So gg me for a pretty nice $1242. First was $4.5 or so.

I also played the $1r 3x turbo which is imo the most value for money tournament on Pokerstars. With a $30k gurantee the overall prize pool is usually TRIPLE that!!! Anyways I was double rebuying a million miles an hour as all-in after all-in failed miserably, until I just managed to get upto t30k for the add on period, whereby the add on is another 30k. Shortly after the restart this hand occurs lol.

Poker Stars, $1 + $0.10 NL Hold'em Tournament, 1,500/3,000 Blinds, 300 Ante, 9 Players

UTG: 49,200
UTG+1: 129,430
UTG+2: 90,321
MP1: 52,980
MP2: 58,272
CO: 56,477
BTN: 30,300
SB: 75,510
Hero (BB): 57,510

Pre-Flop: (7,200) J♣ A♠ dealt to Hero (BB)
5 folds, CO raises to 9,000, 2 folds, Hero raises to 57,210 and is All-In, CO calls 47,177 and is All-In

Flop: (116,554) 9♠ A♣ 9♣ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Turn: (116,554) 8♣ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: (116,554) A♥ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: 116,554 Pot
CO showed 9♦ J♥ and LOST (-56,177 NET)
Hero showed J♣ A♠ and WON 116,554 (+63,377 NET)

Calling off with J9o, what a fucking moran!! The very problem with the $1r 3x tourney is that everyone is shoving like crazy just before the add-on period and rebuying in the last blind level for like 3bbs, then after the break they're still shoving and calling light as anything forgetting they can't rebuy anymore HAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!

It's very lucrative though with like a $14k top place most nights for just 7hrs work at $1 buy-in!!


Reply
Quote
Share: