hey horror, weer wat werk voor je
community hier is het volledig oneens met oordeel van een engelse HJ ( voor reacties zie mijn blog) Is dat checkraisen met backdoors en 2nd en third pair nu echt zo retarted als iedereen hier lijkt te denken? want ben eigenlijk geneigd judge hier toch ook wat credit te geven ( neem aan dat judges niet random worden geselecteerd via loting ofzo
)
was going for a bluffcheckraise here, probably should have gone into check-calling range, or is it ok to have this in check-raising range like line I took.
guess i had to much showdownvalue here and could not make worse fold
Button ($19.29)
SB ($11.95)
Hero (BB) ($10.05)
UTG ($8.85)
UTG+1 ($18.01)
MP1 ($13.96)
MP2 ($17.31)
MP3 ($10.67)
CO ($7.38)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 10
, Q
5 folds, CO raises to $0.30, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.20
Flop: ($0.65) 2
, K
, 10
(2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.30, Hero raises to $0.97, 1 fold
Total pot: $1.25 | Rake: $0.06
Results below:
Spoiler
Hero didn't show 10
, Q
.
reactie judging: Hi,
I think c/r flop is fine. he is going to c-bet most of his pre-flop raising range and middle pair decent kicker is ahead . He would also likely rather call his draws than 3-bet so you don´t get blown off your hand and you can always pick up Q/T/ flushdraw on the turn which improves your hand.
That also allows you to c/r wider range for value.
https://www.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=320388
ps: post soms ook in engels forum omwille van snelle respons; niet omdat ik jou advies niet op prijs zou stelle hoor. Anders had ik dze hier ook niet gepost