[Geschlossen] Das nenn ich mal passiv....

Da hatte ich festern auch jemanden:

Es war aber an einem NL 22 $ SnG:

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (7 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

SB (t3415)
Hero (t1630)
UTG (t2450)
MP1 (t1025)
MP2 (t2565)
CO (t1255)
Button (t1160)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 3, 8.
2 folds, MP2 raises to t100, CO raises to t200, 3 folds, MP2 calls t100.

Flop: (t475) 2, 3, 4 (2 players)
MP2 checks, CO checks.

Turn: (t475) 9 (2 players)
MP2 checks, CO checks.

River: (t475) J (2 players)
MP2 checks, CO checks.

Final Pot: t475

Results in white below:
MP2 has 7s Ah (flush, jack high).
CO has As Ad (flush, ace high).
Outcome: CO wins t475.

Besonders schön fand ich den Check am River mit den Nuts.

Das ist ein klassischer Fall von "Checking behind the nuts for value"

Original von borntocook
Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (7 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A, K.
3 folds, CO calls, 2 folds, Hero raises, CO calls.

Flop: (4.50 SB) 4, 4, 7 (2 players)
Hero bets, CO calls.

Turn: (3.25 BB) 8 (2 players)
Hero bets, CO calls.

River: (5.25 BB) A (2 players)
Hero bets, CO calls.

Final Pot: 7.25 BB

CO has Kd Ks (two pair, kings and fours).
Hero has Ad Kh (two pair, aces and fours).
Outcome: Hero wins 7.25 BB.

wassn daran jetzt so besonders?!?
passiert doch jedem jeden tag hundert mal...

hätte er jetzt die andern beiden 4en gehabt wärs krass passiv gewesen, aber so...callingstation halt.

Das sind keine Gambler mehr, sondern Callingmachines oO