Skip to forum
Search
Forums
Poker Strategy and ...
No Limit
Advanced hand discu...
NL200SH: KT top 2 g...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL200SH: KT top 2 gets a lot of action

 
Advanced hand discussions for No Limit
Last Post by _Anonymous_ 18 years ago
17 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
213 Views
RSS
Timor83
Timor83
Joined: 08.06.2007
Posts: 713
Elite Grinder
06.05.2008, 14:21

Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)
[tg]MP3$419.82:///////;BB$325.23:///////;MP2$124.45:///////;Hero$302.80:///////;BU$214.05:///////;SB$197:///////;[/tg]
1/2 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is CO with T♠, K♥
MP2 folds, MP3 calls $2.00, Hero raises to $9.00, 2 folds, BB calls $7.00, MP3 calls $7.00.

Flop: ($28.00) K♦, 3♥, T♦ (3 players)
BB checks, MP3 bets $8, Hero raises to $32.00, BB folds, MP3 calls $24.00.

Turn: ($92.00) 3♠ (2 players)
MP3 bets $54, Hero raises to $150.00, MP3 raises to $362.00, Hero raises to $261.80 (All-In).

River: ($715.80) Q♥

Final Pot: $715.80

Villain is 40/20/3.5 after 128 hands. Can i consider laying this down?
He could have a 3, but I doubt he'd donk the flop multiway with that, so my guess is he probably has a K as well.


16 replies
swissmoumout
swissmoumout
Joined: 24.02.2007
Posts: 2,966
Elite Grinder
06.05.2008, 14:46

3-bet the flop.
The only hands that beat you here are 33, T3 and K3, so I think I'd still shove the turn as played


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
06.05.2008, 15:00

don't forget about TT and KK ♦

Honestly here you ave a fish or an extremely lucky guy limp calling his 33 :rolleyes:

Maybe he can have KJ as well but I think he can fold them, at least on the turn...
Otherwise it is also very likely he holds Q :diamond:J :diamond:...people go crazy with that hands sometimes...


Timor83 Topic starter
Timor83
Joined: 08.06.2007
Posts: 713
Elite Grinder
06.05.2008, 15:08

Originally posted by swissmoumout
3-bet the flop.

I did. Or do you mean raise bigger?


swissmoumout
swissmoumout
Joined: 24.02.2007
Posts: 2,966
Elite Grinder
06.05.2008, 15:12

Oh I misread the action, thought you had bet/called -.- but yeah actually you can raise more - like 40-45$.


Thorsten77
Thorsten77
Joined: 28.05.2006
Posts: 1,686
BlackMember
09.05.2008, 02:17

Well, against a fish I see me going broke. KK/TT are very unlikely, 33 is also unlikely, K3/T3 shouldn't be in the hand. A fish may pay off with AK, so I get it in.


Chob
Chob
Joined: 03.02.2007
Posts: 1,506
BlackMember
09.05.2008, 09:55

he can't have TT / KK anyway or would have raised preflop


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVtTy44f9D0

Timor83 Topic starter
Timor83
Joined: 08.06.2007
Posts: 713
Elite Grinder
09.05.2008, 14:26

Well, Baluga theorem at it's finest, he showed A3.


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
09.05.2008, 14:52

.


TribunCaesar
TribunCaesar
Joined: 29.04.2007
Posts: 5,547
Elite Grinder
10.05.2008, 16:49

Nice flopcall ^^


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
10.05.2008, 17:53

Then this means that you were results oriented in this hand ♦ because this looks totally standard.
And everyone forgot to mention that AA beats you as well ^^


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
10.05.2008, 18:43

I think even a fish knows AA doesn't play well multiway ^_^


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
10.05.2008, 18:53

Originally posted by sw0ldo
I think even a fish knows AA doesn't play well multiway ^_^

why don't they raise with it then?


chenny8888
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007
Posts: 17,715
Elite Grinder
11.05.2008, 09:21

Originally posted by helemaalnicks

Originally posted by sw0ldo
I think even a fish knows AA doesn't play well multiway ^_^

why don't they raise with it then?

slowplay obv


chenny8888 / hav0c (my online nick) / "you are such a luckbox" (my live poker nick):

//d3ltpfxjzvda6e.cloudfront.net/Editorial/elements/ps_image_arrow_link.pngSNG Bronze Hand Evaluations ||https://d3ltpfxjzvda6e.cloudfront.net/Editorial/elements/ps_image_arrow_link.pngFeedback to my SNG Bronze coaching
//d3ltpfxjzvda6e.cloudfront.net/Editorial/elements/ps_image_arrow_link.pngVideos I did for PokerStrategy.com: https://www.pokerstrategy.com/_forum-runtime/wp-content/plugins/pst-forum/assets/images/legacy-status/status-xs-bronze.png Bronze videos || https://www.pokerstrategy.com/_forum-runtime/wp-content/plugins/pst-forum/assets/images/legacy-status/status-xs-silver.png Silver videos || https://www.pokerstrategy.com/_forum-runtime/wp-content/plugins/pst-forum/assets/images/legacy-status/status-xs-gold.pngGold videos
//d3ltpfxjzvda6e.cloudfront.net/Editorial/elements/ps_image_arrow_link.pngNew Zealand (AOTEAROA - THE LAND OF THE LONG WHITE CLOUD)

Timor83 Topic starter
Timor83
Joined: 08.06.2007
Posts: 713
Elite Grinder
11.05.2008, 14:11

Originally posted by undercover82
Then this means that you were results oriented in this hand ♦ because this looks totally standard.
And everyone forgot to mention that AA beats you as well ^^

Well, not really, since I had a bad feeling based on timing tells + baluga theorem in mind.
Okay, those aren't really solid lock arguments, I know, so I guess in this hand it's kinda murky. But every time I look for excuses to call in these situations, Baluga hits me right in the face ♦


swissmoumout
swissmoumout
Joined: 24.02.2007
Posts: 2,966
Elite Grinder
11.05.2008, 16:02

isn't baluga theorem about 1-pair hands?


_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
11.05.2008, 16:29

In most cases yes, unless the board pairs.


Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share: