Rivered top 2 v fish

Everything seems promising. Loose player, blind war and two pairs on the relatively dry board, something went wrong tho. You should have thought what worse hands were calling your 2,2 bet. I think there's plenty of them though since hes most likely very lame player, great deal of weaker hands we may get money from.

Can you really expect him to show up with better?

Sets are possible.
Can he do that with AQ/KQ?

Originally posted by nitrol
Sets are possible.
Can he do that with AQ/KQ?

Doesn't say what room, nor any reads on villain.
He can certainly do that with AQ, maybe with KQ.

But I think that here you must call the 3Bet.
Let's say his range consists entirely of sets and broadway hands with a queen -- not even any bluffs.
Here we are:

Board: 2♣7♥3♠ T♦
       Equity     Win     Tie
BU     66.69%  61.24%   5.45% { QdTc }
BB     33.31%  27.85%   5.45% { QQ, TT, 77, 33-22, AQs, KQs, QTs+, AQo, KQo, QTo+ }

Even if you leave out all but sets and AQ we're a coin flip:

Board: 2♣7♥3♠ T♦
       Equity     Win     Tie
BU     45.27%  45.27%   0.00% { QdTc }
BB     54.73%  54.73%   0.00% { QQ, TT, 77, 33-22, AQs, AQo }

OTR we're being asked to chuck an additional $1.71 into a pot of 9.27
1.71/9.27 = 18%
We have much better equity than that.
He needs to be bluffing only once in 5 times to break even in this situation.

Disclaimer: I sure hope I did the math right -- please check!;

Cheers,
VS

If he can do this with AQ/KQ, we are calling then.