SH Zoom AA, Facing River Minraise

With the paired board I do not think you can call. He has 7x,33,99 in his range.

Tough spot. Generally no, you are not in front here 17% of the time - river bluff raises are incredibly rare on micro limits. Even a micro maniac will be worried about the strength you've shown over three barrels.

General play note - 2.5BB is probably a little weak preflop in micros. Most will raise 3, and I still merrily advocate for 4BB raises below NL50.

I think u can call.
The reason is I can see him doing this w Q9, that has reasonable combos.

I think you are not very often ahead here. I would usually fold here but if there is a little chance that villain does this with AQ or KK that he didn't 3bet pre, I would call. The price is so good.

Originally posted by Afulibador
I think u can call.
The reason is I can see him doing this w Q9, that has reasonable combos.

If we assume he is defending the normal range here vs CO he has many 7x hands,33,99. I highly doubt that he will defend Q9o, at least he shouldn't. If he has Q9s in his range too with all those other hands that beat us, we have only 6%. We can barely call if villain has Q9s and AQ in his range here but would he really minraise TPTK OTR?

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by Afulibador
I think u can call.
The reason is I can see him doing this w Q9, that has reasonable combos.

If we assume he is defending the normal range here vs CO he has many 7x hands,33,99. I highly doubt that he will defend Q9o, at least he shouldn't. If he has Q9s in his range too with all those other hands that beat us, we have only 6%. We can barely call if villain has Q9s and AQ in his range here but would he really minraise TPTK OTR?

I saw similar plays at tables and mini-raise is not always super monsters... but, in some cases, a thin value bet when villain THINKS he is ahead. And I mentioned Q9 thinking he could call w Q9o ip (loose, but possible).

We have insignificant sample on villain and we cannot make an educated guess. I am not a fan of calling in such situation. It is more possible he has 7x than Q9.

Originally posted by nitrol
We have insignificant sample on villain and we cannot make an educated guess. I am not a fan of calling in such situation. It is more possible he has 7x than Q9.

Or 33.

33 too. He had it?

Ugh. It's probably a fold but I'm almost always paying him off in-game because I'm a fish.

Originally posted by nitrol
33 too. He had it?

misclicks anyone? ♦

I call, it's ugly but

Originally posted by Alleen86

Originally posted by nitrol
33 too. He had it?

Read my first post.

Originally posted by Alleen86

Originally posted by nitrol
33 too. He had it?

uahauhauhauhauha... man, that said, was a bet like "crying to be called".

Originally posted by MJPerry
Ugh. It's probably a fold but I'm almost always paying him off in-game because I'm a fish.

Not that fish... great odds, and its a weird play on river.

thazar, if villain is playing too many tables, can be possible a misclick (I do sometimes).

BUT... I dont think so in this case.

Originally posted by Afulibador

Originally posted by MJPerry
Ugh. It's probably a fold but I'm almost always paying him off in-game because I'm a fish.

Not that fish... great odds, and its a weird play on river.

Yeah the odds is what makes it the not-worst-call ever, but I doubt he's bluffing 1/5 times and I don't think there's many value hands <AA that take this line.

It's a very small mistake in the long run, but probably something worth considering.

Even more when u consider u are going to discover what the hell he did that.
Its not a big mistake, as u said, and u find it out hahaha

the other thing is if you start folding folding to a clickback it with a decent hand it can make you exploitable. (this obviously requires villain to be able to exploit it - which is unlikely at NL10)