PLO5 6543ss sandwiched with sucker combodraw

Perhaps reasonable to call with plan to fold if BU continue aggression on flush completing turn? Raw equity could be good enough and side pot will be empty so there is also less reason for BU to be aggro on diamond turn. If turn complete straight could be good to donk bet?

Originally posted by ghaleon
Perhaps reasonable to call with plan to fold if BU continue aggression on flush completing turn? Raw equity could be good enough and side pot will be empty so there is also less reason for BU to be aggro on diamond turn. If turn complete straight could be good to donk bet?

Yep.. that´s what I did...

I was aware that my suckers could be dominated easily but the flop texture is so light and preflop ranges are very loose overall.
His turn sizing is halfpot only so I decided to call once more and otr because I am not folding anymore I decided to shove it by myself, which might have been another mistake though (?) - since BU is straightforward at showdowns. I guess it depends, if he calls his straights. Otherwise check-folding in hindsight somehow presents itself as the best option, but at the table to me it looked like such a weak play so I just shoved.

I wouldn't open this hand preflop, but I guess it's possible.

As played I fold flop multi-way after BTN raise.
You don't have invested that much and you are frequently dominated I think and only a 3 gives you the nuts.

Originally posted by najtreg12
I wouldn't open this hand preflop, but I guess it's possible.

As played I fold flop multi-way after BTN raise.
You don't have invested that much and you are frequently dominated I think and only a 3 gives you the nuts.

+1

Perhaps only open PF if you have a bunch of weak/tight players behind. These hands are just too much trouble multiway IMO.

Solver opens this when suited to 6.

solver is too loose for my playing level.

In my gameplan I researched and found I should not be opening this hand even from a 30% CO rfi. despite being in accordance to GTo i am going to acccount this pre raise as an mmistake...

but thank you guys for mentioning it

Originally posted by Mascherano95
iPoker

By far the biggest leak is your room choice.

I wouldn't open 6-high from MP and I am quite surprised it's solver approved.
Maybe if you input into the solver the 6.6% rake, the 4 players that are 20-60bb and the extreme loose preflop action, it would be quite different.

I think big difference is that in solver multiway pots in general are somewhat unlikely afaik. In reality its much more likely and this hand probably would favor HU pots.

Originally posted by nsavov

Originally posted by Mascherano95
iPoker

By far the biggest leak is your room choice.

I wouldn't open 6-high from MP and I am quite surprised it's solver approved.

+1

I love IPoker but would not play microstakes there. Rake is too insane

Originally posted by nsavov

Originally posted by Mascherano95
iPoker

By far the biggest leak is your room choice.

I wouldn't open 6-high from MP and I am quite surprised it's solver approved.
Maybe if you input into the solver the 6.6% rake, the 4 players that are 20-60bb and the extreme loose preflop action, it would be quite different.

I am not playing at Ipoker. It is just the poker skin.

Originally posted by nsavov

Originally posted by Mascherano95
iPoker

By far the biggest leak is your room choice.

...

Originally posted by tranceactor
...

I am not playing at Ipoker. It is just the poker skin.

If it's in Ipoker network, it has the same rake.

Originally posted by Kyyberi
If it's in Ipoker network, it has the same rake.

This hand was played at Win2Day which belongs to the national Austrian Lotteries while the Ipoker network belongs to Playtech.
They have different playerpools but using the same software engine fyi.

Ah, you have austrian and finnish players in the pool.