I don't feel super great about this hand. I got dealt JJ UTG. Well, you can see the action below.
PokerStars - $0.02 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 107 BB
SB: 219.5 BB
BB: 209.5 BB
Hero (UTG): 167 BB
MP: 107 BB
CO: 102.5 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has J♥ J♦
Hero raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, BTN raises to 10.5 BB, fold, fold, Hero calls 7.5 BB
Flop: (22.5 BB, 2 players) 7♠ 6♠ 4♥
Hero checks, BTN bets 13.5 BB, Hero raises to 46 BB, BTN raises to 96.5 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 50.5 BB
Turn: (215.5 BB, 2 players) 9♦
River: (215.5 BB, 2 players) 7♣
Spoiler
Hero wins 208 BB
Villain had T♥:T♣:
What I don't feel great about is that based on the villain's PF action he might easily have an overpair. Flop might suggest he has AK/AQ of spades. A set is also a possibility. Given the action I get on the flop, only hands I'm not dead against are a flush draw (with likely 2 overcards, so it's a flip), and an overpair lower than my JJ (TT, 99, 88 [which has 4 additional outs in 5s]). If villain has QQ, KK, AA, he's willing to put his money into the pot as he did here.
However, I don't see how I would've played the hand differently. After his 1/2 bet on the flop I raised, effectively making me committed to the all-in in case he has QQ+. On the other hand, had I not raised here I would've let AQ+ and flush draws to draw.
Really an uncomfortable hand to think about in retrospect. Is this just one of those situations where money goes in the middle, or is there a way to play this in a different manner?