Opponent stats: 40/10/7.1 33 hands
my stats: 28/25/15.4 33 hands
Decent implied odds, but such an easily dominated hand
Pacific Poker - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
SB: $2.32
BB: $2.39
UTG: $2.02
CO: $2.17
Hero (BTN): $2.56
SB posts SB $0.01, BB posts BB $0.02
Pre Flop: (pot: $0.03) Hero has A♠:3♠:
fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.05, SB raises to $0.20, fold, Hero ???
Against a passive villain I would fold pre-flop. Offcourse you can try to hit a straight or flush with your hand.
Cheers,
SDK1987
I think it is a good hand to 4bet bluff.
But vs a fish I wouldn't.
Only vs aggressive Villains with a 3bet frequency of at least 10%.
So in this case I would fold preflop. The hand doesn't have enough equity or implieds to call either vs Villain's presumably stronger 3bet range.
However, 33 hands is not a good enough sample size, not even for preflop stats.
4x 3 bet against a villain your donβt know much about after 33 hands. I like the 4 bet option but we are playing at NL2, doesnβt pool play tighter.
I would probably fold and pick a better spot to shove on villain. IMOβ¦
OK good.
I folded but it felt like a π move.
The worst scenario is two spades on the flop facing a bet from SB
Otherwise fairly easy hand to get away from when totally miss the flop.
Originally posted by VorpalF2F
The very best scenario is two spades on the flop facing a bet from SB.
yes, i agree.
that said, snapcall pre.
