GTO Poker Theories - The Region-Beta Paradox
Do you only get motivated to work hard and grind after a big downswing? This is an example of the Region-Beta Paradox.
One of the real gifts poker has given me is that it has been a great jumping-off point to learn things from other disciplines like economics, AI, psychology, and Game Theory. So here is a series of articles where I bring some of the most interesting things I have learned from other subjects outside of poker which are applicable to this game we know and love.
The Region-Beta Paradox illustrates how we often tolerate "not-too-bad" situations, inadvertently hindering our growth toward truly beneficial circumstances. The paradox proposes that slightly unsatisfactory situations are sometimes worse than those that are plainly terrible because they don't motivate us to instigate change.
Named after the statistical term "beta" which indicates the risk level of a specific investment, the Region-Beta Paradox was introduced by Dan Gilbert, the author of “Stumbling on Happiness.” Gilbert demonstrated this paradox through a simple analogy of commuting to work. People might tolerate a longer, more strenuous walk instead of opting for a quicker, easier bike ride if the discomfort of walking is tolerable.
The paradox manifests when we cling to comfort and familiarity, despite the knowledge that we could achieve greater satisfaction. We may think we're in a "good enough" state, but we're not wholly content or satisfied.
This paradox is observable in various facets of life. For instance, someone might be in a relationship that offers comfort and stability, but they're not genuinely happy. We all know someone who has remained in a less-than-satisfying relationship for too long. Alternatively, someone might have a job with a good salary and benefits, yet they lack a sense of challenge or fulfillment. We find ourselves feeling stuck, even though our circumstances aren't necessarily dire.
Waiting for a crisis
I heard about this concept this week and immediately recognised it from something mental game coach Jared Tendler has discussed with me often.
He has worked with hundreds of poker players and identified that many of them need to go on a significant downswing to motivate them. They get lazy about working on their game and/or putting in significant volume, and the only thing that pulls them out of their slump is a bad run of cards.
He calls this 'waiting for a crisis' and it is not a healthy approach to the game. Not least because it requires losing more than one should before the problem gets rectified.
Tendler is a proponent of developing steady, stable, motivation rather than swingy motivation with peaks and troughs.
Understanding that the Region-Beta Paradox is a thing is key. It allows us to take a wider view of our situation and how small problems, left untreated over time, compound into massive problems long term.
What theories from outside of poker have helped your game? Let us know in the comments.
Related articles
