Originally posted by zetozinho
What's your roll? If you have at least 50 buy-ins for NL5 just go for it (that's what I consider the minimum).
For instance, if you have 250$ play it and drop down if you lose some, say at 150$.
Sometimes variance can be harsh and it's perfectly possible for a winning player to have losing stretches of 10 buy-ins or even more.
I don't think you should notice huge differences in the quality of the game until NL25.
Best of lucks.
I am just short of 40 buy ins for 25NL. But sadly I have no experience of anything above 2NL on 'Stars.
I plan to take a shot at 5NL for 5 or 10 buy ins. If I get a run good going I plan to remain there. But if I fail to play my A game due to any psychological reasons, sub optimum play due to playing for more money etc, I intend to use a stop loss plan, regroup and analyse my play at 5NL.
I am an experienced cash game player albeit at 2NL, and have experienced many 20+ buy in downswings in my time.
The fact that I have managed to win $300 in the last 150k hands played, is playing on my mind that another huge downswing is imminent. The last one was -42 buy ins. 22 of which was down to tilt. So because of the mental game leaks which crept into my game, I plan to play it safe. Regroup, analyse and adjust to the new player pool.
I think the tilt issue was caused in part because of boredom, being over-rolled for 2NL, and not concerned about losing a few all-ins due to being well-padded.
I am pleased you say there is not much difference in the games up to 16NL. That is encouraging. I am determined this year to stop being a fun player and take the game more seriously. Hopefully, by the year's end, I will be bossing 16NL.
Thank you for your reply.