Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

99 - multiway, your response on flop?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
140 Views
Pokrovec
Joined: 07.01.2010

The villain on BB is unknown, the villain on MP is 55/9 after 79 hands (marked as fish)

PokerStars - $0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

UTG: $7.32 (146.4 bb)
MP: $5.91 (118.2 bb)
Hero (CO): $5.03 (100.6 bb)
BTN: $7.26 (145.2 bb)
SB: $5.00 (100 bb)
BB: $5.16 (103.2 bb)

SB posts $0.02, BB posts $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has 9♦: 9♣:
fold, MP raises to $0.10, Hero raises to $0.30, 2 folds, BB calls $0.25, MP calls $0.20

I am raising to isolate against loose MP, unfortunately BB joined the action

Flop: ($0.92, 3 players) 3♠: 7♠: 4♦:
BB checks, MP bets $0.75, Hero folds, BB calls $0.75

My thought process was:
MP range: ATs+ (FD), 88+, 77, 33, 65, and some SD's like A5, A6. And then there is BB after me ... So I decided to fold to get out of that tricky situation.

Spoiler

Turn: ($2.42, 2 players) 5♦:
BB checks, MP bets $1.00, BB calls $1.00

River: ($4.42, 2 players) T♣:
BB checks, MP checks

Results: $4.42 pot ($0.18 rake)
Final Board: 3♠: 7♠: 4♦: 5♦: T♣:

BB shows 8♦: 8♠:: (One Pair, Eights)
(Pre 54%, Flop 77%, Turn 86%)

MP mucks Q♦: K♣:: (High Card, King)
(Pre 46%, Flop 23%, Turn 14%)

BB wins $4.24


Reply
Quote
2 replies
Zaratras
Joined: 03.01.2009

Though choice but I think you made a good fold in a three-way pot. I would called without the BB.

Crazy how it turned out....


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Yeah, I think you must fold.
Because of the pot odds BB is getting his range includes 65 -- not likely though for sure.
But on this board you have the 2nd worst overpair, so you even if we assume that both opponents have only two overcards we're ahead, but not by much.


Board: 3♠7♠4♦
       Equity     Win     Tie
MP3    28.38%  27.32%   1.06% { TT+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
CO     43.23%  42.70%   0.53% { 99 }
BB     28.38%  27.32%   1.06% { TT+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }

I just realized that the above includes overpairs, so maybe strictly by the numbers you could continue


Reply
Quote